Page 29 - Auditors Article
P. 29
THE PROBLEM
Why are the ‘big Four’ so dominant? Perhaps the BEIS is
correct in apportioning some of the responsibility to the
complacency in large corporates towards their auditors, where
they found that of FTSE 100 auditors remain in place for an
average of 48 years. [Bowdler, L.,2019] For Patisserie Valerie this
was fourteen years. Perhaps both big clients and the ‘Big Four’
see their relationship as based on perceived prestige.
This cosy relationship is enhanced if the banks insist that as
part of their loans corporate borrowers must not use a non-
Big Four auditor. [Bowdler, L.,2019] The following highlights some
major problems:
1. The market is captured – all major companies must
deliver an annual audit. Patisserie Valerie was no
exception and therefore cannot be avoided.
2. Based on what is provided an audit is essentially a
commodity which is pronounced fine or not fine with
nothing in between. The importance of accurate financial
statements in making lending/investing decisions cannot
be overstated. In some instances, the rules excuse
auditors from responsibility over their clients’ accounting
estimates because such estimates are inherently
unverifiable. [Financial Times, 3] In the case of Patisserie
Valerie all was fine until it was not.

