Page 16 - Stakis C Case Study
P. 16

Increased profits and earnings per share will surely ensure
                 the future survival and growth of Stakis, provided  the

                 management team can be retained.


                 By 1994 the board essentially comprised some six

                 members - Sir Lewis Robertson, Michels, Chisman, and;

                 two non-executives and Sir Reo who was now 82 and took

                 no effective role. Paradoxically, the structure of Stakis
                 under the stewardship of Sir Lewis Robertson and David

                 Michels had reverted to a similar flat structure evident

                 prior to Andros’ stewardship. The difference being that

                 tight financial control was exerted from the centre with
                 little duplication of functions and concentration on core

                 business activities. Under Andros and Sir Reo there was

                 clear strategic drift with divisions entering and leaving the
                 portfolio e.g. in 1988 there were five divisions. By 1994

                 under David Michels, there were only two divisions.



                 Using Argenti's model some interesting discussion points
                 arise. Not the least of which is the tightness and loyalty of

                 the group under Michels compared to that under Andros.

                 Likewise. the roles of Sir Reo and Sir Lewis are likely to

                 point to the latter providing a mentorship of exceptional
                 quality.



                 Perhaps, unlike David Michels, Andros failed to create a
                 team which would challenge the efficacy of his decisions.



                  From the first half of June to November 1996 Stakis under

                 David Michels had spent over £200m buying over two
                 dozen hotels. This was followed in November by the
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21