Page 77 - General Cases 1
P. 77
Australia’s Decision
The court also ordered it to pay
the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission's (ACCC)
costs and publish both online
and newspaper corrections. The
ACCC said the company took advantage of people's
medical ignorance for profit.
"The ACCC took these proceedings because it was
concerned that consumers may have purchased these
products in the belief that they specifically treated a
certain type of pain, based on the representations on the
packaging, when this was not the case," chairman Rod
Sims said.
"Truth in advertising and consumer issues in the health
and medical sectors are priority areas for the ACCC, to
ensure that consumers are given accurate information
when making their purchasing decisions."
A hearing will be held at a later undisclosed date to decide
what fine the company faces
A Generic Product or
Marketing Con?
Nurofen denied it deliberately deceived consumers but
consented to the court orders.

