Page 77 - General Cases 1
P. 77

Australia’s Decision

                                                        The court also ordered it to pay

                                                        the Australian Competition and

                                                        Consumer Commission's (ACCC)

                                                        costs and publish both online

                                                        and newspaper corrections. The
               ACCC said the company took advantage of people's


               medical ignorance for profit.


               "The ACCC took these proceedings because it was
               concerned that consumers may have purchased these

               products in the belief that they specifically treated a

               certain type of pain, based on the representations on the

               packaging, when this was not the case," chairman Rod

               Sims said.
               "Truth in advertising and consumer issues in the health

               and medical sectors are priority areas for the ACCC, to

               ensure that consumers are given accurate information

               when making their purchasing decisions."



               A hearing will be held at a later undisclosed date to decide


               what fine the company faces


                                                     A Generic Product or



                                                     Marketing Con?



               Nurofen denied it deliberately deceived consumers but

               consented to the court orders.
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82