Page 33 - UNIDO SECiM - 2020 Highlights

Sub component 2.4
LEATHER VALUE Results and Impact 2020
CHAIN

● ISO14001 Environmental management system for Internal
Auditors
● Workplace management and good housekeeping– 5S
● Cleaner tanning technologies
● Chemical optimization for tanneries
● Leather Industrial Parks – Lessons for Mongolia based on
experiences in other countries
● Finished leather quality improvement measures
● Virtual Showcase of Mongolian tanning industry for Indian
Tanners Association
The result of these web based trainings is in TR 29.

Output 2.4.2: Employment plan for the new Light Industrial Technology Park available
● Completed in 2018-2019.

Activity 2.4.2.3: Develop
a Tannery On-line Self-
Assessment Tool
(TOSAT) with focus on
safety, cleaner
production, efficiency, ● Completed in 2018-2019.
including socially relevant
topics on gender, decent
work and anti-child labour
issues with corrective
action plan

● For the purpose of increasing high value, high end leather
goods exports and performance of Mongolian leather industry
the project through Mr. Viswanathan Munusamy, who is not
only UNIDO international expert, but also LWG Lead Auditor
has been coaching Darkhan Minj tannery for their preparation
to apply for LWG environmental certification. Depending on
COVID situation, the real audit plan will be confirmed.
● The project sub-contracted RDILI to organize the leather and
Activity 2.4.2.4: Support textile industry marketing activities including Fashion show, b2b
to market linkage meetings and job fair. MALI played an instrumental role in
development and linking leather goods manufacturers/SMEs to be engaged in
information systems and this activity. Building on MALI’s experience in 2019 leather
value chain goods competitions to promote leather industry, product
credit/finance. development and creativity as well as to enhance skills of
contestants, were organized in specific areas such as bags,
accessories and shoes for both men and women. Total of 50
different leather goods which were produced by 30 young
designers from 12 factories, 3 students from UEFDI, 9
individual producers were received. Submitted products were
assessed by a team of judges consists of representatives from
shoe factory, tannery and university and each product was
evaluated in terms of cutting, sewing technology, design and
comfortness with 10 points for each criteria.

Page | 30