Page 23 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 23

Chapter  III  introduces  and  describes  the  methodology  for  the  research,  the  research

               perspective, my approach to  data collection and analysis.  I begin  with  the rationale  for using


               grounded theory, the link between the research and the data, introduce PALAR (Participatory

               Action Learning combined with Action Research) which I argue offers a good fit for this social


               constructivist exploration into the ‘aware experience’ of dialogue group members that engages in

               a different conversation within the sense of community and self in the presence of others. These


               conversations reflect a way of being ‘I’ aware to the presentation of self. Theories pertaining to

               public space and inclusion, democracy and freedom, rationale discourse, and conflict and tension


               in dialogue are presented which I argue establish a basis for understanding the civic engagement

               “Metasphere” environment and cite factors influencing the interactions among those gathered.


                       Chapter  IV  is  my  presentation  of  findings  that  methodologically  documents  the  data


               obtained from Community Conversation participants and facilitators at one or more of the group


               dialogues meetings that took place in Albany, New York. I review characteristics of the event,

               group  interactions,  interviews  and  observations  in  the  whole  process  of  obtaining  a

               “metaspherical” description in order to relate an empirical real experience, survey sampling, and


               discern  the  limitations  of  the  study  -relating  those  characteristics  of  design  that  impacted  or

               influenced the application of surveys and factors affecting the overall research.



               Analysis and findings from the research are documented in Chapter IV and based on information

               obtained from interviews with dialogue participants and facilitators about communication among


               and between the participants of Community Conversation groups are included methodologically.


                       In Chapter V further analysis of the data obtained from the CC interviews in both cities

               are then broadened using dimensional analysis. Results and revelations coming from the analysis


               of the data, which has been coded and grouped into dimensions, are discussed in Chapter V, and






                                                              4
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28