Page 458 - The_story_of_the_C._W._S._The_jubilee_history_of_the_cooperative_wholesale_society,_limited._1863-1913_(IA_storyofcwsjubill00redf) (1)_Neat
P. 458

The Story of the C.W.S.                                  —
         meeting.  And (neatly begging the question)  " will the flag of
         human rights be raised in the citadel of co-operation ? " asked the
                "                                        first charge
         Guild.   Their claim was that labour must be the
         upon industry,"  said Mr.  Perry,  of  Stockport,  in moving the
         adoption at Manchester.  "  If this was an agitation for better wages
         against the private capitalist, and by increasing wages they could
         reduce his profits," replied Mr. Penny, of Sheffield, " I would say,
         '  Go ahead with  all speed.'  But in the co-operative movement
         things are not the same.  There the consumer is an employer and a
         worker in the co-operative factory at one and the same time, and
         the difficulty is to strike an exact balance."  On a vote complicated
         by it being out of order for Enfield to withdraw at short notice in
         favour of Leicester, the C.W.S. Committee, in their united attitude,
         were supported by a majority at its smallest by over a thousand
         votes.
            At this meeting Mr. Lander had emphasised the sincerity of the
         Committee as a body and its genuine desire to decrease hours and
         increase wages to the  greatest extent  possible.  The campaign
         for a binding  resolution, however,  continued.  Certain factors
         were on the side of the agitation.  There was the precedent of
         the minimum for men and the circumstance of 1911-12 being a
         period of universal good trade.  Miss Llewelyn Davies, the leader
         of the Guild upon this  issue, argued that  "  as the dividend  is
         equalised, wages should be equahsed, too," and, assuming such
         a communism, together with continued general prosperity,  it was
         easy to prove the cost a comparative trifle.  Societies hke Pendleton
         came forward to say they were paying the scale for 850 employees
         men and women—and (said their Portsmouth Congress representa-
              "                                Naturally wishiag that
         tive)  it had been to their advantage."
         the C.W.S. should faU into line, the general body of co-operators
         rapidly were coming to believe the  difficulties exaggerated.  At
         the Portsmouth Congress of 1912 an attempt to find a via media
         through the estabhshment of district boards, after the practical
         manner of the new Miners' Minimum Wage Boards, proved belated.
         And in December, 1912, the C.W.S. Committee announced that
         the wages of a fairly large number of girl and women workers below
         the scale had been improved, that, as a further step, the scale
         was to be apphed in the distributive departments, and that the
         more  difficult problem  of  the productive works was  receiving
         attention.  It only needed the fact of the C.W.S. Jubilee being
         at hand to quicken the desire for going all the way.  On behalf
                                     362
   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463