Page 200 - Deep Learning
P. 200

The Growth of Competence                 183

            task is to draw a map of the world, that same proposition forces you to choose
            some projection of the spherical surface of the Earth onto the flat surface of
            the map, a problem that does not arise for people who believe in a flat Earth,
            but it does not specify which projection is best. if you want your map to exhibit
            geographic areas in their correct proportions, use a Sylvanus projection, but if
            you, like sailors, want your rhumb lines – courses of constant compass bear-
            ing – to appear on the map as straight lines, use Mercator’s projection. The
            belief that the Earth is round does not specify or recommend any particular
            action, but it can be used to reason about action in an infinitude of situations,
            most of them not contemplated at the time in life when this belief is adopted.
               practical  knowledge,  in  contrast,  specifies  which  action  or  actions  to
              perform to solve some task. If you want the elevator to come, push the button
            is a prototypical example. Actions must be adapted to the situation at hand if
            they are to be effective, so practical knowledge must include knowledge of the
            conditions under which an action should be performed and the conditions
            under which it should not. if you are at an intersection and the traffic light is
            red, you are supposed to stop; if the light is green, to keep going. in most cases,
            the contingency of action is more intricate and complex than this example,
            but the principle is the same: An action is appropriate under some conditions
            but not under others. to be competent, to know what to do, is to know when,
            under which conditions, to do what.
               These observations imply that the smallest unit of practical knowledge
            is a three-way association between a goal, a situation (or a class of situations)
            and an action (or action type). For historical reasons, such three-way associa-
            tions between goals, situations and actions are called production rules, or rules
            for short.  The term “rule” inconveniently confuses implicit knowledge in a
                   21
            person’s head with explicitly codified entities like traffic laws, but the usage is
            too entrenched in cognitive science to escape. We can represent a rule in the
            following schematic way:
                               Rule: Goal, Situation  Action,

            which is a shorthand for the hypothesis that the person whose rule it is, when
            pursuing the specified goal and finding himself in a situation of the specified
            type, will consider the action mentioned in the right-hand side of the rule. The
            situation is assumed to be specified as a conjunction of features (the water is
            boiling and the tea leaves are in the strainer and the strainer has been placed in
            the cup …). A three-way association is an atom of practical knowledge that
            cannot  be  split  into  smaller  parts  that  themselves  are  meaningful  units  of
            practical knowledge. The hypothesis that practical knowledge is represented
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205