Page 318 - Deep Learning
P. 318

The Formation of Belief               301

            word and replace the mental model of a flat surface with the mental model of
            a sphere. However, research by Joseph nussbaum, stella vosniadou and others
            on young children’s mental models of the earth has revealed a different out-
            come: The seemingly simple statement is assimilated to the child’s flat earth
            model. 19
               To see the mechanism of assimilation operating in this case, consider the
            options open to the child. What could the adult mean by saying that the earth
            is round? The word “round” is ambiguous; it is used to refer to both circular
            (a two-dimensional property) and spherical (a three-dimensional property).
            Which of these meanings will be activated? Unless the child conceives the
            earth as extending indefinitely in all directions, the flat earth must have an
            edge somewhere, and an edge is a kind of thing that can be circular. The child
            is likely to conclude that the adult is saying that the flat earth has a circular
            edge. in our work with schoolchildren Jason Leigh, Andrew Johnson, Thomas
            Moher and i often observed that when asked to draw the earth, the children
                                    20
            unhesitatingly drew a circle.  When asked which direction is upward with
            respect to this circle, some children held their pencil perpendicular to their
            drawing, with the tip of the pencil pointing toward the ceiling. The drawing
            was not intended as a two-dimensional rendering of a sphere, but as a top-
            down view of a pancake earth. in short, if the listener believes that the earth is
            flat, the apparently contradictory discourse, the Earth is round has no power to
            teach him or her otherwise, because the listener’s prior beliefs hold too much
            power over its interpretation.
               surely adults succeed in getting through to the child eventually? Holding
            up a globe and saying, this is the Earth ought to settle the issue of circularity
            versus sphericality. However, vosniadou and co-workers found evidence for
            yet another assimilation at a later stage in the child’s development: Children
            who accept that the earth is a sphere might nevertheless misunderstand the
            situation in a way that allows them to retain the concept of a flat living space.
                                                                           21
            They documented that some children believe that the earth is spherical but
            hollow, half filled with soil and with a hole near the top through which the
            sun shines. We live inside this hollow sphere, walking about on the flat surface
            formed by the soil that fills the lower half of the sphere. in this way, the asser-
            tion that the earth is a sphere is assimilated to, and distorted to be consistent
            with the prior belief that we live on an approximately flat surface.
               in short, although writing and speaking seem like straightforward ways
            to communicate a new idea, close analysis shows otherwise. Comprehension
            poses multiple interpretive choices at the word, sentence and discourse lev-
            els, and the choices depend so heavily on the recipient’s prior beliefs that the
   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323