Page 33 - Deep Learning
P. 33

16                         Introduction

            change that was too rapid for this type of adaptation. Learners, on the other
            hand, can deal even with rapid change.
               our superior ability to learn is arguably our species-specific character-
            istic, so a theory of the human mind requires a learning theory as one of its
            components. As long as psychologists conceptualized the environment within
            the clockwork mind-set, it was clear in principle how learning works: Because
            change is an illusion and reality consists of stable regularities, a person can
            learn by accumulating experiences, analyze them to identify the regularities,
            project those regularities onto the future and act accordingly.
               This  requires  certain  cognitive  capabilities.  to  accumulate  experience
            requires memory. Each event or experience must leave a trace of some sort –
            richard W. Semon suggested that we call it an engram but it is now more often
            called an episodic memory – which can be reactivated later to inform action at
                          41
            some future time.  Although early efforts by Karl Lashley and others to locate
            individual engrams in the brain were unsuccessful, the existence of such traces
            is not in doubt.  Every person can recall any number of events and situations
                        42
            that have happened in his own past, and textbooks in cognitive psychology
            require multiple chapters to describe the many experiments that investigate
            our capacity to form, retain and retrieve episodic memories. 43
               Memories  of  individual  events  are  not  very  useful  in  themselves,  but,
            according to the received view, they form the raw material for further learn-
            ing. By extracting the commonalities across a set of related episodic memories,
            we can identify the underlying regularity, a process variously referred to as
            abstraction, generalization or induction. The output of this supposed process
            is a knowledge structure that summarizes a regularity that was present in a
            person’s past experience.  There is little doubt that people are capable of iden-
                                44
            tifying patterns in sequences of experiences. People obviously form general
            concepts like food, kin and tool, and the march of the seasons, the phases of
            the moon and the cycles of the tide must have been identified by early humans
            long before the systematic investigations we now call science began.
               In the clockwork view, general knowledge is useful because the regularities
            in past experience are also the regularities that will control future experiences. We
            can form more or less precise expectations about what future situations will be
            like on the basis of what the past was like. Indeed, the past is our only source of
            information about the future. The process of applying a regularity from the past to
            future situations is traditionally called transfer by psychologists and induction by
            logicians, but the philosopher nelson Goodman suggested the more descriptive
            term projection.  under any name, this process is useful to the extent that regulari-
                        45
            ties in past experience continue to operate in the future.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38