Page 84 - Deep Learning
P. 84

The Production of Novelty               67


                  Collective

                  Individual

                  Mind

                  The unconscious

                                Selective  activation  Conscious  evaluation
                   Neural                   reflection and  Perception of  action outcomes  Communication with  other individuals
                   patterns




                                               Insight: transition of a
                                               knowledge element into
                                               consciousness

            Figure 3.2.  The four envelopes of selection in generate-and-test. each envelope con-
            tains a generator and an evaluator, which together constitute the generator for the next
            envelope.



            conscious processes of combination and selection. Such a nested generate-and-
            test mechanism is more powerful than a single-level mechanism; see Figure 3.2.
            at each level, the combination process works with elements that have already
            been subject to selection at the lower levels. evaluation is carried out by succes-
            sively more encompassing envelopes of selectivity: in the first envelope, uncon-
            scious ideas pass into consciousness as a function of hard-to-describe mental
            filters like beauty, stability, interestingness and so on; in the second envelope,
            new conceptual combinations are evaluated via conscious reflection; and in the
            third envelope, a new thought is articulated into a discourse, prototype, sketch
            or other type of product that is subject to evaluation by the judgments of peers
            or teammates and, when relevant, by its material consequences.
               The articulations of the combination principle proposed by Poincaré, by
            Simonton, and by Finke, Smith and Ward share some similarities, but they also
            differ from one another in some respects; see table 3.1 for a comparison. This
            type of theory answers two of the four creativity questions: Novelty is possible
            because cognitive elements can be combined in for all practical purposes infi-
            nitely many different ways. Creative thinking differs from noncreative think-
            ing in that the former results in novel cognitive combinations while the latter
            works with previously produced combinations.
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89