Page 33 - Insurance Times December 2020
P. 33

the increasing efficacy of the scheme from the farmers'  has also gone up by almost 25% from Rs 11,258 in 2016-17
          standpoint.                                         to Rs 14,038 in 2018-19. This has in turn, rippled into an
                                                              increase of almost 42% and 52% in average claim per insured
          Sustainability: Insurance works on the principle that the  farmer and insured hectare respectively. Here it is pertinent
          cost of risk at an individual or household level will significantly  to note that the farmers' share in the gross premium has
          reduce when diversified risk exposures are aggregated in a  actually gone down from 19.2% in 2016-17 to 16.9% in
          portfolio. This is why the risk of yield losses that can become  2018-19, the rest being subsidized by state and central
          catastrophic for individual farmers becomes commercially  governments.
          viable for insurance companies. In this process reasonable
          profits for insurers have to be allowed, in order to ensure  This means that the burden of attaining sustainability for
          their sustained interest.                           the scheme is not being passed on the farmers but is borne
                                                              by the government. While this is fine for the farmers, the
          Despite profits, insurance remains beneficial for individuals  fiscal burden for the government is rising. This perhaps
          on account of the aleatory nature of risks it covers. Hence,  explains the recent decision of Central Government to
          social insurance schemes like PMFBY need to offer adequate  reduce its share in the premium subsidy for PMFBY from
          protection to farmers while remaining profitable for insurers.  50% to 25% in irrigated areas and 30% in non-irrigated
          Therefore, while very low claim ratios diminish the client  areas. Social insurance needs to be sustainable not just for
          value of the scheme, very high claims ratios impair its  the risk carrier but also for the government that rolls out
          sustainability. The appeal of insurance lies in attaining and  huge subsidies as well as the farmers who also pick-up a part
          maintaining a right balance between sustainability and client  of the cost.
          value.
                                                              It is actually a healthy sign to see a variety of market forces
          In the last three years the average premium rate for crop  at play trying to balance the equilibrium of crop insurance
          insurance has gone up by almost 15% from 10.7% in 2016-  in the country. A market-based system keeps evolving
          17 to 12.3% in 2018-19. In a competitive bidding system  according to the market dynamics which in turn helps the
          with such large volumes involved an increasing premium  sector  in  discovering  the  right  balance  between
          rate indicates a correction towards sustainable pricing. On  sustainability and client value so that a palpable de-risking
          the other hand, probably because of increase in input costs  of agriculture sector takes place. Only then can a win-win
          as reflected in the scale of finance, the average sum insured  situation emerge for all stakeholders.
          per insured hectare has also increased by almost 27% in
          three years.                                        Conclusion
                                                              To sum up, the above data reveals that crop insurance
          Both these factors have had a compounding effect on the  schemes in India are moving in the right direction towards
          average premium per insured farmer and insured hectare  gaining scale, client value and sustainability. Agriculture
          which  have  increased  by  37%  and  46%  respectively.  insurance schemes however, need to be evaluated on a
          Correspondingly, like the claim ratio, the average claim size  bigger longitudinal timeframe for any definitive conclusions.


                        Crop Insurance Performance 2016-2019 (PMFBY and RWBCIS)

          Year        Average  Average    Average   Average    Claims    Claims   Average   Average    Average
                     Premium   Premium     Sum     Premium   Incidence   Ratio     Claims   Claim Per   Claim
                        Per     Per Ha    Insured   Rate (%)    (%)       (%)       Size     Insured     Per
                      Farmer     (Rs.)      Per                                     (Rs.)    Farmer    Insured
                       (Rs.)              Ha (Rs.)                                            (Rs.)    Ha (Rs.)
          2016-17      3,748     3,832    35,842     10.7%     25.5%     76.7%     11,258     2,874     2,939
          2017-18      4,801     4,922    39,697     12.4%     33.1%     86.5%     12,536     4,153     4,257
          2018-19      5,123     5,605    45,502     12.3%     29.1%     79.6%     14,038     4,079     4,463
          Total        4,544     4,756    40,204     11.8%     29.1%     81.1%     12,654     3,684     3,855
          Kharif 2018 and Rabi 2018-19 Claims figures are provisional
              The Insurance  Times,  December  2020
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38