Page 39 - Insurance Times December 2020
P. 39

vs Govind Lal Sahu & Others III (2008) CPJ 89 NCDRC & Mrs.  There is no further need to prove that a manufacturer/
         Rashmi Handa, & Ors v OTIS Elevator Company (India) Ltd  supplier was negligent. However, the consumer shall not
         & Ors I (2014) CPJ 344 (NC) In Tata Motors vs Rajesh Tyagi  have any defence available if they have modified, altered,
         and HIM Motors Show Room-II (2014)(1) CPC267, the    misused the product or failed to follow the security and
         NCDRC held that:                                     warning instructions.
         "We  have  also  taken  a  view  that  onus  shifts  to  the
         manufacturer to show that the vehicle does not suffer from Product Liability Insurance needs of the
         manufacturing defect once the complainant has proved and  hour?
         discharged the initial onus that the vehicle was defective  The product liability insurance policies shall indemnify the
         on the basis of large number of job cards showing that  insured against their legal liability to pay compensation
         vehicle was taken on many occasion for removing one defect  including legal expenses of claimants in accordance with the
         or the other. goods sold to the consumer is not only defective  law of the land.  Most product liability policies shall exclude
         but also suffers from manufacturing defect."         settlements made in countries that operates under the law
                                                              of US & Canada.
         The action for product liability can be invoked under CPA
         2019 against manufacturer/ supplier if the  Product is  Product liability policies are a specific form of general liability
         defective and/ or consumer is charged excessively and/or  policies which meant to protect from financial & legal
         there are unfair trade practices by the trader.      consequences which might be caused by bodily injury,
                                                              property damage to third party while using the product.
         In order to file a claim under liability, it is mandatory to prove  There are always chances for something to go wrong and
         that product was defected and these defects made the  manufacturer or suppliers may be vicariously held liable to
         product harmful and caused damages. The defects can be  own up the damages.  This may give rise to a legal dispute.
         categorized broadly in three categories which may give rise  Although one may want to fight back and may win the case
         to manufacturer or supplier liability.               but the legal expenses to win the battle might be very high.
                                                              Thus product liability insurance may protect against any
         Design Defects - The defects are caused at the planning  claim made by the customer arising due to injury caused by
         phase itself even before the manufacturing.  Such defects  the use of the product.
         make the product inherently unsafe.
                                                              Usually, it is assumed that liability policies should be owned
         Manufacturing Defects - These defects enter in the product  by big business houses.  Now when the Indian economy is
         during the manufacturing or assembling of the product.  thriving and society is becoming litigious with the awareness
                                                              of one's rights, easy access to various redressal forums, the
         Marketing Defects - inadequate safety warnings, inadequate  time has come when every business houses including startups
         or incomplete instructions, improper labeling etc. are  should consider owning a product liability insurance.  A small
         marketing defects.                                   baker, boutique owners, florists, wholesalers, restaurants,
                                                              food stores can have liability policies to cover themselves
         Once the consumer has decided to raise the issue the
         following doctrines shall come to the aid of the consumer.

         Res ipsa loquitur (Latin: "the thing speaks for itself") is a
         doctrine in the Anglo-American common law which shifts the
         burden of proof to the defendant(s).  It means if the doctrine
         invoked effectively, the consumer has not to establish but it
         shall be the defendant(s) to prove in the court of law that it
         was not negligent.

         Another rule which becomes handy to plaintiffs (consumer
         in relevance to CPA 2019) in product liability cases is the
         doctrine of strict liability. If strict liability applies successfully,
         the plaintiff needs to prove that product was defective.
                                                                      The Insurance  Times,  December  2020
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44