Page 40 - The Insurance Times October 2025
        P. 40
     3.5  Misalignment  with  Corporate  Risk 4.4 Reducing Regulatory and Legal Escalation
         Management                                           Regarding an ineffective internal grievance process, many
         Grievance data from ombudsman cases rarely integrates  disputes get referred unnecessarily to lawsuits, regulators or
         into insurers' enterprise risk management (ERM) systems.  the media. An effective Independent Internal Ombudsman
         Without a strong internal mechanism, firms miss early  process can prevent the escalation of complaints through
         warning signals for misconduct, agent fraud, or claims  transparent disputes and remedies while saving a company
         mismanagement.                                       significant legal fees and preserving its reputation.
         These constraints indicate a requirement for an additional 4.5 Supporting Product and Service Innovation
         internal, yet independent, pathway to resolve issues before  IIO complaint data may provide significant information to
         escalation, thus supporting the proposition for an Internal  product designers, actuaries, and customer experience teams.
         Insurance Ombudsman.                                 Trends of recurring complaints can reveal an underlying issue
                                                              with policy wording, exclusions, communications materials, or
         4.  Benefits  of  an  Internal  Insurance            agent training. Thus, the IIO can assist departments with
                                                              continuously improving service quality.
         Ombudsman
         Establishing an Internal Insurance Ombudsman (IIO) brings  5. Implementation Challenges
         several strategic, operational, and regulatory benefits for
         insurers, consumers, and the financial system. These benefits  The Internal Insurance Ombudsman  model  has  great
                                                              potential, but challenges still exist for implementation.
         extend beyond complaint resolution, contributing to a
         culture of accountability, organisational learning, and ethical  Successful implementation depends on institutional will,
                                                              regulatory support, and structural safeguards.
         conduct.
         4.1 Faster and More Accessible Resolution            5.1 Independence and Neutrality
         Unlike external ombudsman services that may require long  One of the considerations with an IIO is whether the IIO can
         procedural steps and waiting periods, internal ombudsmen  be independent in a for-profit organisation.  Business
         offer quick, informal resolution. For many consumers,  pressures may call credibility into question unless there are
         especially those in rural or underserved areas, the IIO offers  clear reporting relationships, strict conflict of interest rules,
         a cost-free, jargon-free alternative that is approachable and  and protections against retaliation.
         responsive. Reducing resolution timelines also improves
         customer satisfaction and retention.                 5.2 Role Confusion with Customer Care
                                                              It is important to differentiate the IIO from standard
         4.2 Strengthening Consumer Trust                     customer service. The IIO should be viewed as a quasi-judicial,
         Usually, consumers are more loyal to organisations that  fair process, not just another escalation level. Achieving this
         acknowledge  and  address  a  complaint.  An  internal  will require definitive SOPs, awareness campaigns, and the
         ombudsman enhances the organisation's transparency and  education of policyholders on their responsibilities.
         shows empathy, especially where a sensitive conversation
         exists related to health, life, or disability claims. Speaking 5.3 Cost and Operational Feasibility
         with  a  neutral  officer  of  the  organisation  promotes  For smaller insurers and insurtech start-ups, creating an
         emotional trust and minimises the potential for public  ombudsman office may prove too costly an option. A
         dissatisfaction.                                     workable option could be to share an ombudsman among
                                                              group companies or to hire the position externally, with
         4.3 Early Warning and Risk Containment               appropriate governance oversight.
         IIOs are strategically important in identifying recurring
         complaints  like  product  mis-selling,  delays  in  claims 5.4 Integration into Governance Framework
         settlement, or agent impropriety, which indicate broader  For the IIO to work well, it should be built into the company's
         systemic risks. By connecting with compliance and audit  compliance framework and report to the board's risk or audit
         teams and maintaining feedback, the IIO can assist in  committee. This may require many insurers to update their
         limiting reputational harm, legal liability, or regulatory  internal governance policies to make the  integration
         enforcement action.                                  possible.
                                                                           The Insurance Times  October 2025  37





