Page 14 - Banking Finance December 2017
P. 14

LEGAL UPDATE


          United Breweries' ac-             Land Compensation increased by Apex Court
          counts attached by SEBI           The Apex Court has increase land compensation for some 300 landowners in
                                                                        Haryana who will now get Rs. 45 lakh and Rs.
          SEBI had recently ordered attachment                          35 lakh per acre instead of Rs. 33 lakh and Rs.
                            of bank ac-
                            counts as well                              18 lakh decided by the land acquisition officer.
                                                                        In ruling of Bijender vs State of Haryana, the
                            as share and
                            mutual fund                                 court applied the belting system in which the
                                                                        land abutting the road was given the highest
                            holdings of de-
                                                                        value and the plots behind were awarded pro-
          faulter businessman Vijay Mallya-led
          United Breweries (Holding) Ltd (UBHL)  portionately less. Examining the sale deeds of adjacent lands determined the
          to recover dues totaling Rs. 18.5 lakh.  correct market value of the land acquired. Finally the Supreme Court had al-
                                            lowed the appeal of the landowners for higher compensation.
          The decision has been taken after
          UBHL failed to pay the fine imposed
          on it. In 2015, SEBI had levied a fine  Tribunal free to follow own rules
          of Rs15 lakh on the company for dis-  The Supreme Court recently stated in the case of International Asset Reconstruc-
          closure lapses regarding creation and  tion Co vs Official Liquidator of Aldrich
          invocation of certain pledge transac-  Pharma and others, that the Tribunal is not
          tions in shares of United Spirits. The  limited by the rules of the Code of Civil Pro-
          pending dues-totaling Rs. 18.5 lakh-  cedure and can devise its own procedure.
          include the initial fine of Rs15 lakh  The matter was in relation to the time limit
          and interest of Rs3.5 lakh and a re-  for moving an appeal to the debt recovery
          covery cost of Rs. 1, 000.        tribunal which is different from the period
          In an attachment notice dated 13  set in the Limitation Act.
          November, SEBI asked banks, deposi-  The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act allows only 30 days while the Limita-
          tories and mutual funds not to allow
                                            tion Act condones a delay of 45 days and more, if sufficient reasons are given.
          any debit from the accounts of    The judgment stated that the RDB Act was enacted to facilitate and expedite
          UBHL. However, credits have been  recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions by summary proceed-
          permitted. Further, SEBI has directed
          the banks to attach all accounts, in-  ings before a statutory tribunal. Moreover, a tribunal is not a court though it
          cluding lockers, held by the defaulter.  has the trappings of a court.
          "There is sufficient reason to believe
          that the defaulter may dispose of the  Trademark misuse led to compensation
          amounts in the bank accounts and se-  While deciding on case of Orient Ceramics & Industries Ltd vs Square Ceramic
          curities in the demat accounts held                            Ltd., the Delhi High Court   stated that the con-
          with your bank, depository, mutual                             duct of Square Ceramics was "deplorable" and
          fund, and realisation of amount due                            indicated "a tendency to indulge in illegal ac-
          under the certificate would in conse-                          tivities and to obtain wrongful advantage"for
          quence be delayed or obstructed,"                              violation of trademark.
          SEBI said.
                                                                         The trademark in dispute was 'Orient' for ce-
          Mallya held 7.91% stake in UBHL in  ramic and vitrified tiles sold throughout the country. The rival firm incorporated
          his personal capacity as of December
          2016 while the total promoter hold-  in Gujarat used the name 'Oriento' for the same products such as tiles which
          ing through various entities stands at  was allegedly similar to that of Orient Ceramics.
          52.34%, according to the latest BSE  It was mentioned that the play of words and the design and colors used in pub-
          data. He has been in the UK since he  licity materials would mislead consumers. The Gujarat firm was imposed a com-
          left India on 2 March 2016.       pensation of Rs. 10 lakhs for violation of trademark.


            14 | 2017 | DECEMBER                                                           | BANKING FINANCE








                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19