Page 36 - The Insurance Times June 2020
P. 36

experienced country in launching and flying humans into
         space. Their technology is getting old but has reached an  When the sound of the rocket hits
         unprecedented level of reliability. In terms of capabilities and  you, your body physically feels the
         technology, Falcon 9 is indeed way more advanced than the
         Soyuz. However, I believe we would need to see a few more  power of the vehicle. And when you
         successes before it becomes the reference in the field of  know someone is sitting on top of the
         human rated launch vehicles.
                                                                  vehicle, the adrenaline connects
         (PG): Is the entrepreneurial zeal of Elon Musk the           directly to your emotions.
         differentiator over an established bureaucracy of
         Boeing?
         (PL): It is certain that Elon Musk had a vision and has  still remember every moment of this event, not only because
         remained committed to it, even in difficult times of early  he was the first tourist to fly to space.
         failures of Falcon 1 rockets. Both the technical and the
         manufacturing efficiencies of SpaceX give them a very  (PG): Would space tourism generate enough
         substantial advantage over any competition. Boeing needs  traffic to make it commercially viable? Would it
         to re-focus on making good aircrafts and good space vehicles  commence with visits to the international space
         in the hard environment of Covid crisis and strong aerospace  station?
         competition. It is even more challenging for them to switch
                                                              (PL): Space tourism has always been extremely popular. Just
         all their staff to a “nothing is impossible” mode – like SpaceX
                                                              ask your friends and relatives, you would be surprised by the
         staff seems to have adopted since day one.
                                                              number of people who would like to fly to space. The hurdle
                                                              is usually not the risks but the financial part of it. Dennis
         (PG): Did you watch the SpaceX launch from its
                                                              Tito’s flight to the space station cost him USD 20 million in
         own ‘trampoline’? Did you feel any different from    2001. Twenty years later, the price has reduced by a factor
         any past onsite launches? Which of them has          100. No doubt this trend will continue. I need to add the
         been the most memorable?                             numerous number of near space experience offered today
         (PL): Indeed, I watched the entire live cover for both the  from accurate simulators to 0-gravity flights in airplanes.
         first attempt and the actual launch on May 30th. I would  I believe, however, that the International Space Station is not
         not miss any step of the amazing launch preparation  the easiest place for tourism. First, it was designed as a
         sequence. I was lucky enough to be involved in many  laboratory and it requires specific and complex training. Second,
         manned space program starting from Shuttle to Mir docking  I do not believe that tourists would want to fly for more than
         and ISS key life support systems. I attended many launches  a few hours, simply because the body reactions during long
         in many countries but launch of humans is always more  spaceflights are still difficult to accept just for pleasure. Third,
         emotional than satellite launches. I have seen Shuttle launch  going to and returning from the International Space Station
         from Cape Canaveral and Soyuz inhabited launch from  requires a difficult in-orbit rendezvous. It is inefficient to fly there
         Baikonur cosmodrome. I cannot help from thinking about  and return just for fun. I believe that short term flights to
         the exceptional number of equipment and qualified people  experience no gravity and to see the earth from above using a
         who need to be ready and work exactly as planned at T-0  dedicated vehicle is certainly the future.
         (launch second).
         As an engineer, I am also always impressed  by the   (PG): Are actuaries and underwriters ready to
         performances necessary to bring astronauts to a much faster  price such risks?
         speed than a bullet. This Dragon 2 Demo flight was no  (PL): Underwriting space risks is usually not an actuarial
         different. However, attending a live launch on the launch  exercise, for the simple reason that the statistics are usually
         pad is incredibly special and cannot be forgotten. When the  too low in numbers to draw any inference. Space
         sound of the rocket hits you, your body physically feels the  underwriters are usually qualified space engineers who
         power of the vehicle. And when you know someone is sitting  would consider the flight data, manufacturing record and
         on top of the vehicle, the adrenaline connects directly to  testing of the equipment that are used – to price the risk. I
         your emotions. I was lucky to seat just next to Dennis Tito’s  remain proud to have provided insurance for the first
         family on the launch pad of Baikonur in April 2001. Today, I  commercial Falcon rocket.

          36  The Insurance Times, June 2020
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41