Page 29 - LIFE INSURANCE TODAY Novemver 2017
P. 29

LEGAL







         Legal Case Studies on Maturity Claim







             Bhubaneswar Ombudsman Centre                     settled the claims of the Complainant under different
                                                              policies along with interest for delay wherever applicable,
                     Complaint No-24-001-1135                 the grievance of the complainant has thus redressed and
                     Sri Sudhakar Mohapatra                   in the result, the complaint is treated as allowed for
                                                              statistical purpose.
                                 Vs.

                Life Insurance Corporation of India              Bhubaneswar Ombudsman Centre
                (Bhubaneswar BO:II of Bhubaneswar D.O.)
                                                                         Complaint No-24-001-1142
         FACT :-                                                            Sri R. Shaktidharan
         The Complainant had taken six policies from LICI under the                  Vs.
         latter’s salary savings schemes. The policies matured but
         claims were not settled. In case of some policies, survival  Life Insurance Corporation of India
         benefit due was not settled and the complainant                (Rourkela BO of Sambalpur D.O.)
         contended that Bolangir B.O. of the O.P. should transfer
         the premium amount to its Bhubaneswar BO-II to enable  FACT:-
         payment of his dues. In its Self-Contained Note, the O.P.-  The Complainant had taken one LICI policy bearing no-
         insurer stated that as all the policies were under salary  590049547 from the LICI (inured) with date of
         saving scheme, the premiums were remitted to different  commencement as 28.03.1990 for sum assured of
         branch offices of it. In some cases also, inappropriate  Rs.40,000/- under convertible whole life plan for 20 years
         amounts were remitted. However, the insurer presented  term. The initial premium was fixed for Rs.63.30/- monthly.
         a detailed chart in policy-wise in the Self-Contained Note  As per the terms of the policy, premium needed to be re-
         where it had reconciled the position and made payments  fixed on completion of five years of the commencement.
         to the complainant.                                  But, this was not done. When the policy matured, he was
                                                              paid Rs.14,907/- as net maturity value as against his
         AWARD:-                                              payment of Rs.15,912/- during the term.
         At hearing, both parties attended and the Insurer’s
         representative handed over the cheques to the        On the other hand, the insurer in their Self-Contained Note
         complainant in respect of the payable cases mentioned in  informed that as per the terms & conditions of the policy
         the SCN. The complainant also confirmed receipt of the  in question, the monthly premium had to be revised to
         cheques.                                             Rs.220.80 after five years, but the monthly payment of
                                                              premium till maturity was Rs.63.30. So, they recovered the
         The Hon’ble Ombudsman observed that as the Insurer has  differential premium amount with 9% interest

                           It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.


         Life Insurance Today                        November 2017                                            29







                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34