Page 61 - Banking Finance February 2026
P. 61

CASE STUDY

         RBI's supervisory concerns                           Risk management functions lacked sufficient independence
         The Reserve Bank of India repeatedly flagged concerns  and authority to challenge business decisions. A weak
         regarding asset quality recognition, governance standards,  challenge culture allowed optimistic assumptions to persist
         and capital adequacy. Divergences between RBI's inspection  despite mounting evidence of stress.
         findings and the bank's disclosures raised questions about  Credit risk governance is not merely about models and
         transparency and internal controls.                  policies; it depends on institutional willingness to question
         As provisioning requirements increased following supervisory  growth strategies when risk indicators flash warning signals.
         reviews, the bank's profitability and capital buffers  Over-reliance on restructuring and evergreening
         weakened, further constraining its ability to absorb losses.  Repeated restructuring and refinancing masked underlying
         Liquidity stress and erosion of confidence           credit deterioration. While restructuring can be a legitimate
                                                              tool, its misuse delays loss recognition and compounds
         Credit risk issues eventually translated into a broader
                                                              eventual impact.
         confidence crisis. As asset quality concerns became public,
         investor sentiment deteriorated and depositors began  Lessons for banks and regulators
         withdrawing funds. The bank faced rising funding costs and
                                                              Early recognition is non-negotiable
         declining access to wholesale markets.
                                                              Delayed recognition of credit stress magnifies losses.
         Liquidity stress intensified in late 2019 and early 2020,
                                                              Conservative asset classification and timely provisioning
         creating a feedback loop: deteriorating credit quality
                                                              remain fundamental to banking stability, even in growth
         weakened confidence, which in turn aggravated liquidity
                                                              phases.
         risk. This underscores a key banking lesson-credit risk, when
         unmanaged, rarely remains isolated.                  Concentration risk deserves board-level oversight
                                                              Large borrower and sectoral concentrations should trigger
         Regulatory intervention and reconstru-               heightened scrutiny, stress testing, and explicit board
         ction                                                approval. Growth should never compromise diversification.

         In March 2020, the RBI imposed a moratorium on Yes Bank, Credit risk governance must be independent
         superseded the board, and initiated a reconstruction  Risk and credit functions must have independence, stature,
         scheme. A consortium led by State Bank of India infused  and access to the board. Incentive structures should reward
         capital, restoring solvency and stabilising operations.  sustainable asset quality, not short-term growth.
         The intervention prevented systemic contagion and    Integration of credit, liquidity, and capital planning
         protected depositors, but it also highlighted the cost of  Yes Bank's experience demonstrates how credit risk can
         delayed corrective action in credit risk management. Equity  cascade into liquidity and capital crises. Integrated risk
         shareholders suffered significant dilution, and the bank's  management-not siloed oversight-is essential.
         reputation faced long-term damage.
                                                              Conclusion
         Analysis of credit risk failures
                                                              The Yes Bank case is a powerful reminder that credit risk
         Inadequate portfolio-level risk oversight            failures are rarely sudden. They build gradually through
         While individual credit proposals may have appeared viable,  optimistic assumptions, governance weaknesses, and
                                                              deferred recognition of stress. While regulatory intervention
         portfolio-level risk aggregation was insufficient.
         Concentration limits, sectoral caps, and correlation analysis  prevented systemic fallout, the costs-to shareholders,
                                                              reputation, and market confidence-were substantial.
         were either relaxed or inadequately enforced.
                                                              For banks, the lesson is clear: disciplined credit underwriting,
         Effective credit risk management requires moving beyond
                                                              strong portfolio oversight, and a culture of risk challenge are
         transaction-level approval to portfolio-wide stress
         assessment-a gap clearly visible in this case.       indispensable. In an era of complex financial products and
                                                              rapid growth ambitions, the fundamentals of credit risk
         Weak governance and challenge culture                management remain as relevant as ever. T


            BANKING FINANCE |                                                            FEBRUARY | 2026 | 53
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66