Page 32 - Banking Finance July 2022
P. 32

ARTICLE


          Adopting plan evaluation process akin to Swiss Challenge, it retains competitive tension such that promoters propose
          plans with least impairment to rights and claims of creditors. The ability of the committee of creditors to require dilution
          of promoter shareholding/ control, in cases resolution plans submitted by the corporate debtor provides for impairment
          of any claims owed by such corporate debtor, should also be a significant deterrent against unreasonable terms in resolution
          plans. The Pre-pack resolution must be approved by financial creditors with a minimum 66 percent voting share by value.


          Silent Feature of Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process vis-à-vis CIRP


           Criteria                 Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution     Corporate Insolvency  Resolution
                                    Process (PIRP)                         Process (CIRP)
           Eligibility              Only MSMEs                             All corporate debtors
           Default threshold        Above Rs.10.00 lac to Rs 1 crore       Over Rs 1 crore
           Initiation by            Only Corporate Debtor (CD), post approval  Financial Creditor/Operational Creditor/
                                    by shareholders & unrelated Fin Creditors  Corporate Debtor
           Timeline                 90 days to submit resolution plan to   180+90+60days extendable up to max
                                    adjudicating authority, Max 120 days for  330 days
                                    entire process. No extension
           Criteria                 Corporate Debtor-in-Possession with    Creditor in control
                                    Creditor-in-Control mechanism
           Invitation for           First right of offer to promoters,     Public Process
           Resolution plan          Swiss challenge method
           Section 29A applicability  Yes                                  Yes
           Consequence of failure   Termination of PIRP                    Liquidation
           Role of Insolvency       Relatively Less                        Relatively More
           professional and
           Adjudicating authority
           Legal framework          Relatively less in statute and more    Relatively more in the statute and less
                                    in regulation                          in regulation

          Challenges with the framework:                      challenging for CoC member to decide on base resolution
                                                              plan within this short period without any broad parameter
          Time and parameter for deciding on the resolution plan is
                                                              on  which  the  Resolution  Plan be  approved  and  main
          major concern, basic motive of PIRP has been introduced is
          that the debtor shall be in better position to revive the
          activities as it is running the unit and doing the operation
          and hence better in control and should be allowed to submit
          a plan for revival of unit and challenge with the prepack
          scheme  is  that  the  Corporate  debtor  may  not  raise
          additional capital from investors because of the risk involved
          in recovering the money being provided by their investors
          and lenders.

          Hence a plan based on the restructuring of debt may not
          help to realize the adequate amount to Financial Creditors
          and may find  it  challenging  to achieve  a  turnaround.
          secondly  timeline  for  PIRP  is  120  days  and  it  is  very



            32 | 2022 | JULY                                                               | BANKING FINANCE
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37