Page 38 - The Insurance Times November 2025
P. 38

files ITR of Rs. 10,00,000/- for a year as per the new enhanced  " It is no longer res integra that Income Tax Returns are
         tax slab.  Based on this, the loss of income would be calculated  reliable evidence to assess the income of a deceased"
         as follows:
                                                              The insurance companies always take the plea that the
           Scenario        Without ITR      With ITR          income shall not be calculated only on the basis of the ITR
                           (Based on        (Declared         filed and there must be some other document to substantiate
                           Minimum Wage)    Income            the income. The companies request to produce salary
                                            Rs. 10,00,000)    certificate, bank statements, joining letter of the service,
           Annual Income   Rs. 88,920       Rs. 10,00,000     balance sheet of the business etc. to co-relate the income
           Add: 40% Future  Rs. 35,568 (40%  Rs. 4,00,000     with the ITR filed. However, it is very difficult in the court to
           Prospects       of Rs. 88,920)   (40% of           disregard the income based on ITR. In the case of Smt. Shanti
                                            Rs. 10,00,000)    v. Smt.  Ratan Kanwar  SBCMA  1525/2018, the Hon'ble
                                                              Rajasthan High Court considered the income tax returns filed
           Total Adjusted  Rs. 1,24,488     Rs. 14,00,000
           Income                                             by the deceased who was into furniture business.
           Less: 1/3rd Self  Rs. 41,496     Rs. 4,66,667      The MACT did not consider the ITR filed merely on the ground
           Expenses                                           that the registration certificate or any documentary evidence
           Net Annual      Rs. 82,992       Rs. 9,33,333      in support of the business undertaken by the deceased Mamraj
           Income                                             was not produced. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinit Kumar
           Multiplier      18               18                Mathur reflected the importance of filing ITR in the said
           (Age 24)                                           judgment by mentioning that from the business of furniture,
                                                              the deceased was having the income and for the purpose,
           Total Loss of   Rs. 14,93,856    Rs. 1,68,00,000
                                                              the Income Tax Returns were also produced and placed
           Income
                                                              before the Tribunal and hence, there was no reason  to
         There is a difference of Rs. 1,54,00,000/- in the above case  disbelieve the ITR.
         by filing of the ITR (even without any tax liability). So, we can
         conclude that if more people filing their ITR, even less than  While the Supreme Court has consistently upheld the use of
         the threshold limit of Rs. 12 lakhs, it will severely impact the  Income Tax Returns (ITRs) as credible evidence for determining
         amount of compensation.                              income in motor accident compensation cases, there are
                                                              instances where the Court has emphasized the necessity of
                                                              additional corroborative evidence to substantiate income claims.
         Judicial decisions have consistently highlighted the significance
         of documentary evidence in determining compensation  Although, it is difficult to disregard the ITR, the insurance
         amounts.                                             companies shall put forth the submissions more effectively with
                                                              documentary evidences if there are drastic differences between
                                                              the ITR and the actual income. There shall be thorough
         Recently, the Supreme Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
         v. Sonigra Juhi Uttamchand, 2025 INSC 15,  while determining  investigation of the income sources of the deceased/claimants
         the income of the deceased therein had observed:     and verification of the ITR through the department.

         "8. ….Monthly income could be fixed taking into account the  In conclusion, the evolving judicial stance clearly establishes
         tax  returns  only  if  the  details  of  payment  of  tax  are  Income Tax Returns as a reliable and legally endorsed basis
         appropriately brought into evidence so as to enable the  for assessing income in motor accident compensation cases.
         Tribunal/Court to calculate the income in accordance with  These developments underscore the necessity of maintaining
         law."                                                accurate  and  consistent  financial  records,  as  such
                                                              documentation can profoundly influence the quantum. With
         In the interesting case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v.  the introduction of the enhanced income tax slab, not only
         Indiro Devi & Ors. 2018 INSC 575, the deceased was working  are the legal implications far-reaching, but it also serves as
         in the Food Corporation of India. He filed ITR which was  an incentive for more individuals to file their ITRs. This, in
         higher than the salary received by him. The Supreme Court  turn, ensures that compensation awards reflect the quantum
         upheld the income as per the ITR for calculating compensation  based on documentary proofs rather than using minimum
         even if was different from the salary certificate. More recently,  wages  or  notional  income.  The  higher  quantum  of
         in the case of S.Vishnu Ganga vs M/S Oriental Insurance  compensation will certainly impact the underwriting process
         Company Ltd, 2025 INSC 123, the Supreme Court observed:  of the insurance companies.

                                                                           The Insurance Times  November 2025  35
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43