Page 222 - Motor Insurance Ebook IC 72
P. 222

The Insurance Times

         inherent principle of insurance viz. the premiums are paid
         by the many into a pool from which the claim of few are
         paid. It is not fair, it is argued, that when through the
         years the insured has had the protection for which he has
         paid the premium, should be rewarded because the peril
         against which he has been covered, has not arisen.

         The other arguments advanced are:
         a. It creates extra clerical work for insurers in

              calculation of premiums and preparation of renewal
              notices-work which is out of all proportion to its
              value.

         b. It leads to many disputes between the insured and
              insurers, e.g. claims settled under knock-for-knock
              agreement. The insured who considers himself
              blameless would resent the forfeiture of his discount.

         c. At any rate the policy contains a condition that the
              insured shall take all reasonable steps to safeguard
              the vehicle from loss or damage and maintain it in
              efficient condition. He has also to act, under
              Common law, as if he is uninsured; it is therefore,
              inconsistent to offer a further incentive to care.

         The arguments for the no claims discounts are:
         Where physical hazard is of importance in motor

Website: www.bimabazaar.com Call: 033-22184184 / 40078428  222

Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227