Page 45 - India Insurance Report 2023- BIMTECH
P. 45

India Insurance Report - Series II                                                          33


        2.1. Reinsurance Regulations

            Reinsurance is primarily used to spread risks around the world instead of maximizing risk retention
        within a country. Diversification of risk is the fundamental function through which reinsurers create
        value, ultimately providing efficient and effective protection to the ceding insurers. A wise reinsurance
        program can increase an insurer’s financial standing, whereas counterproductive regulatory restrictions
        on the reinsurance program can produce financial instability. In the United States, up to 60% of the
        costs of catastrophic losses are transferred/exported to the international reinsurance industry, significantly
        alleviating local costs and allowing for a swift influx of capital following large events: 67% of the losses
        of 9/11 in the United States, still world’s largest economy, were picked up by the international reinsurance
        industry.  Hurricane Katrina, which hit the US Coast in 2005, is one of the worst natural disasters in the
        world, with economic losses of over USD 150 billion and the insurance industry paying for over USD
        70 billion of this loss, according to one global reinsurer.

            Established centers of reinsurance around the globe have in common a flexible, robust and responsive
        regulatory approach. Their regulators adopt international standards such as those established by the
        International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), implementing transparent policies for the
        authorization and regulation of international insurers, reinsurers and brokers.

            The  Indian regulations, however, take a  different approach  as  compared  to  the International
        Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). The Indian regulations have ‘premium retentions’ mandated
        to measure them at the ‘country level’ / GIC Re (a government reinsurance company) is treated as the
        preferred entity, favouring it with ‘Obligatory Cession’ and ‘Order of Preference’ regulations despite,
        IAIS having a model risk management framework and the “ceding insurer responsibility model” in place.

            Whilst many countries have adopted similar measures as part of their evolution to ensure that the
        local entities are given preferential treatment, it is important for the genuine growth of the market to
        bring in more insurers and reinsurers, who will all play their role in contributing towards the growth of
        the Indian insurance market, by catering to the needs of the policyholder and introducing products that
        would differentiate them from their competition. It is important for policy makers to understand that,
        ultimately, the policyholder will determine the best insurance policy and security that meets their
        requirements. By creating a more favourable environment for attracting business into a jurisdiction,
        there would be a natural flow of business as well as market participants to cater to this business. For
        example, the Singapore Government and  Regulator realized that they  would need to develop and
        implement  appropriate  policies  and  Regulations  to  attract  the  various  insurance,  reinsurance,
        intermediaries, and ancillary companies into Singapore, which would naturally attract global business
        into Singapore. As a result of the various measures that have been implemented, Singapore has now
        emerged as a significant global (re)insurance hubs in the World and is continuing to evolve, despite the
        lack of any substantial local business.



        2.1.1.  The Definition of ‘Reinsurance’ Per The Insurance Act

            The Insurance Act duly amended in 2015 defines ‘reinsurance’ - “re-insurance” means the insurance of
        part of one insurer’s risk by another insurer who accepts the risk for a mutually acceptable premium”. The Act
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50