Page 47 - India Insurance Report 2023- BIMTECH
P. 47

India Insurance Report - Series II                                                          35


            Rather than implementing a protectionist environment, policymakers should consider developing
        and implementing an attractive framework, which would attract much needed (re)insurance expertise
        and capacity to India. India is widely recognized as the fastest growing economy in the World, and offers
        significant potential for insurers and reinsurers to develop new and innovative products as well as look
        at ways to distribute these products into the remote parts of our Country.



        2.1.4.  Retentions


            There is this stated objective that ‘premiums’ need to be retained in India rather than ‘risks’ exported
        out. Whilst the Government and Regulatory objective is to retain ‘premiums’ within the Country, it is
        important that there is a proper risk transfer test prescribed within the Regulations to determine whether
        the 50% risk retention is being achieved. There is a common understanding that the Regulatory objective
        is to retain 50% of the risk within the Country; otherwise, transferring 50% of the premiums does not
        mean that 50% of the risk has been transferred out.

            Regulators also need to consider allowing appropriate investment options for reinsurers, including
        whether these monies can be invested by the parent entity of the branch in line with its stated investment
        objective. Afterall, the entity in India is merely a branch of the foreign parent, and the parent has issued
        an undertaking to the Regulator that it would meet all of its underwriting obligations in India.



        2.1.5.  Retrocession

            Global Reinsurers pool the risks underwritten by all global entities, including subsidiaries and branches
        and purchase a common reinsurance protection (known as retrocession), thereby benefitting from the
        economies of scale and diversification. The Branch operations of the foreign reinsurers are permitted to
        continue to access such their central retrocession program. The retrocession arrangement with the Group
        and/ or affiliate within the Group is through a standard reinsurance contract and is structured on an
        arm’s length principle, which is to ensure that both parties are acting in their own self-interest and are
        not subject to any pressure or duress from the other party. The cession limits currently prescribed in the
        Indian Regulations are also made applicable to the branch operations when placed with entities within
        the Group. Moreover, Regulators across the world permit 100% retro-cession to group companies and
        affiliate companies of the parent company and do not insist on retro-cession to third party entities.
        Moreover, from the Foreign Reinsurance Branches’ point of view, there is a global book that partakes of
        all programs, including India, but the regulatory insistence for a specific Indian retrocession program
        may not have a sound ‘risk’ basis.



        2.2.Branch Offices of Foreign Reinsurers (FRB)


            A significant change brought about by the Insurance Amendment Act 2015 was the opening up of
        the Indian reinsurance market to branch offices of foreign reinsurers. Not content with seeking comfort
        around the entire balance sheet of the parent, its rating, solvency, and its global market conduct, the
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52