Page 22 - Banking Finance May 2023
P. 22

LEGAL UPDATE









          Legal














          Travel co asked to refund         ining the reply from the company and  can be proved only by furnishing the
                                            after conducting a  random check by  name and address of the selling dealer,
          flyers  Rs.  8  crore  it  got
                                            making direct calls to 70 consumers  details of the vehicle which has deliv-
          from airlines for pandemic        who had booked tickets through the  ered the goods, payment of freight
                                            online firm. The company had submit-  charges, acknowledgement of taking
          disruptions
                                            ted to the authority how it is "commit-  delivery of goods, tax invoices and pay-
          The Central Consumer Protection Au-  ted to ensuring all out efforts towards  ment particulars etc."
          thority (CCPA) ordered  online travel  completing the pending refunds" and
                                                                               However, the SC added that while the
          agency Yatra to refund the payments  had even said it was "ready to deposit"
                                                                               tax invoice and cheque can be said to
          of Rs 8.32 crore to customers, which  the pending refund amount of Rs 8.32
                                                                               be proving one of the documents, it is
          it has received from airlines but has not  crore in "an escrow account", if it was
                                                                               not sufficient to prove the genuineness
          been able to return to the customers  directed to do so.
                                                                               of the transaction.
          for the suspension of flights during
                                                                               It should be noted that e-way bills and
          Covid-19 pandemic. The company has  Invoices, cheque payment,
                                                                               e-invoicing under the GST regime can
          been directed to submit an action plan
                                            insufficient to claim Input        come handy to claim ITC in this regard.
          for payment of refund.
                                            Tax Credit: SC                     "Though the ruling is under VAT, GST
          The CCPA has initiated suo motu probe
          into the pending refund of payments to  The Supreme Court (SC) has set aside  authorities may now ask for additional
                                                                               documents to substantiate input tax
          customers by Yatra Online despite the  a Karnataka High Court order that al-
                                            lowed dealers to claim input tax credit  claims by placing reliance on the prin-
          direction from Supreme Court in Octo-
                                                                               ciples  laid down in  the ruling. How-
          ber 2020 to make the refund within  (ITC) under the VAT regime by produc-
                                            ing invoices and cheque payments.  ever, apart from invoice and proof of
          three months.  Stating that the com-
                                                                               payment, documents such as E-waybill
          pany has violated the direction of the  The SC allowed tax authorities' appeal
                                                                               and E-Invoice, could help in substanti-
          Supreme Court,  the CCPA said,  "It is  against the High  Court judgment. It
                                                                               ating the genuineness of the transac-
          clear that the company has not made  said a dealer claiming ITC has to prove
                                                                               tion  under  the  GST  regime,"  said
          any significant effort and neither has  beyond doubt the occurrence of the
                                                                               Harpreet  Singh,  partner  at  KPMG
          created any specific arrangement to  actual transaction" and the "actual
                                                                               India.
          refund Rs 8.32 crore to 16,090 custom-  physical movement of the goods".
          ers and are sitting tight over the re-
                                            It pronounced the order HC as "erro-  Inherited assets tax: ITAT
          funds received by various airlines."
                                            neous" and said that, "for claiming ITC,
                                                                               bats for legal heir
          The order was passed by CCPA chief  genuineness of the transaction and
          commissioner, Nidhi Khare and com-  actual physical movement of the goods  The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax
          missioner, Anupam Mishra after exam-  are the sine qua non and the aforesaid  Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has settled in
            BANKING FINANCE |                                                                  MAY | 2023 | 21
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27