Page 27 - Insurance Times May 2019
P. 27

Imputed negligence means that the law will hold you  from the happening of the accident or incident involved that
         responsible for the negligence of someone else.      a cause of the occurrence was some negligent conduct on
                                                              the part of the defendant. As may be guessed, this doctrine
         Under certain conditions, the negligence of one person can  has been used frequently in aircraft and medical malpractice
         be attributed to another. Several examples can illustrate this  liability cases.)
         principle:
                                                              An important modification of the law of negligence is the
         (Employer-employee relationship; a negligent act by an  doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, meaning "the thing speaks for
         employee, conducted in the scope of his employment, will  itself", refers to situations when it's assumed that a person's
         be imputed to the employer. For example; if you ask your  injury was caused by the negligent action of another party
         secretary to pick up some sandwiches for lunch, she is  because the accident was the sort that wouldn't occur
         acting within the scope of her employment when she drives  unless someone was negligent. Res Ipsa Loquitur is the
         to the shop. If she is at fault in an automobile accident, her  name of a doctrine that permits a trier of fact to infer the
         negligence is imputed to you. You are responsible for the  existence of negligence in the absence of direct evidence
         damages caused by her acts.)                         of negligence.

         Volenti not fit injuria (express or implied)         The question of to what extent a wrong does is liable for the
                                                              consequences of his wrongful act has caused the courts much
         This means the plaintiff knew the risk he was running and
         willingly consented to run the risk (foot baller) and this  difficulty. Clearly the wrongdoer cannot be so held liable for
         defence is not available where a person is under legal or  all possible consequences of his act and such rules are:-
                                                              Y  Responsible for any consequences of his wrong doing
         must obligations to run a risk (Doctor/Police) and it is the
         question of the fact in each case whether the plaintiff's  intended by him.
         knowledge of the risk amounts to consent to run the risk.  Y  Defendant is liable only for damages which a
         Knowledge may be evidence of consent.                   reasonable man will foresee
                                                              Y  Intervention of new cause, its effect is to break the
         Vicarious liability                                     chain of causation between an original act and final

         Which is a 'legal law' under which the liability for the  result. Whether effective cause is the final one or not.
         negligence of another can rest on a contract to assume that  Y  Necessary Conditions for Application -
         liability like a motorist's negligence is imputed to the
                                                              Y  To apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the following
         vehicle's owner?
                                                                 requirements must be met:
         Dram shop law:                                       Y  The event is one that normally does not occur in the
                                                                 absence of negligence.
         A business that sells liquor can be held for damages that
         may result from the sale Legal relationships that can lead  Y  The defendant has exclusive control over the
         to Imputed negligence. Under a dram shop law, a business  instrumentality causing the accident.
         that sells liquor can be held liable for damages that may  Y  The injured a not contributed to the accident in any
         result from the sale of liquor. …if a bar owner continues to  way.
         serve a customer who is drunk and if after the bar closes,
         the drunken customer injures two people while driving back  Damages or injury to claimant:
         home. The bar owner could be held legally liable for the
         injuries                                             The injured person must show that he or she has suffered
                                                              damages or injury as a result of the actions alleged
                                                              tortfeasor.There are certain types of damages
         RES IPSA Loquitur:
                                                              Y  Nominal - Small damages no pecuniary loss
         (The things speaks for itself) under this doctrine the very
                                                              Y  Real - Which is pecuniary loss and divided into general
         fact that event occurs established a presumption of
         negligence on behalf of the defendant and it is their up to  and special damages?
         the defendant to rebut the presumption of negligence.  Y  Special - paid for losses that can be determined and
         (Presumption of Negligence  ...If the foregoing         documented such as medical expenses, loss of earning
         circumstances are established, the trier of fact must find  and property damages

                                                                            The Insurance Times, May 2019 27
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32