Page 23 - Insurance Times May 2019
P. 23

Intentional Tort                                     is a strict liability (Occupational Hazards) and Absolute
                                                              liability is sometimes also called as strict liability. It is a type
         Legal liability can arise from an intentional act or omission
         that results is harm or injury to another or damage's to  of liability which refers to the legal accountability of a
         another property and the person causing the harm meant  person for causing damages/ injury, even if he/ she was not
         to do so. Intentional torts are those wilful acts which harm  at fault or negligent i.e. one is considered liable regardless
         another purposefully. They include acts with an intention  of fault. Now-a-days strict liability is most commonly
                                                              associated with defectively manufactured products.
         or design, though it is not always necessary that the
         consequence be also intended.
                                                              In case of absolute liability, offences do not require evidence
         For example; trespassing into somebody else's property  but once it is proved that the offence has happened then
         without permission, assault on the person, false     the defendant will be completely liable.
         imprisonment or unlawful confinement, defamation of
         character via libel (oral) and slander (written).    Similar to absolute liability, in the case of strict liability as
                                                              well, offences do not require evidence but the burden of
         There are a number of defences to intentional torts, the  proof is placed on the defendant where he can use different
         most common of which is consent.                     defence techniques. First, 'due diligence' defence i.e. he
                                                              should prove that he took every possible precaution to
         Y   A victim consents to a contact. For example; no battery  prevent the offence from happening.
             has been committed.
                                                              This is to be noted that absolute liability is not covered by
         Y   Issues arise in determining whether consent has been
             manifested and what is the scope of the consent  the insurance companies or at the least very limited
                                                              coverage is provided. This is so because absolute liability is
         Y   Silent acquiescence can, but does not always, indicate  usually associated with extremely hazardous situations or
             consent, particularly in ambiguous settings such as  activities.
             sexual contact.
         Y   Consent to a degree of bodily invasion is not consent  Liability in tort:
             to any bodily invasion. For example; in a sports contest,  A civil wrong breach of duty to/of care arises from the
             the participants have consented to a certain degree of  breach of duty fixed by law such duty is towards persons
             violence, perhaps even violence that violates the rules  generally and in breach is redress able a duty of care in
             of the game, but not to conduct far outside the scope
                                                              relation to ultimate consumer.
             of the contest.
         Y   A battery (assault is the imminent apprehension of a  Tort may be for negligence or nuisance against persons and
             battery) or a slander such as hitting someone knowingly  property.
             or spreading a malicious, harmful rumour aware that
             it is untrue.                                    Nuisance:-

                                                              Public Nuisance:
         Unintentional torts
                                                              Y  Unlawful act of or an omission to discharge a legal duty,
         Negligence in a slip or false casetypically involves a failure  which may causes inconvenience or annoyance to the
         to act or action in a manner that is not characteristic of a  public, interferes with the exercise of enjoyment of a
         reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances; in  right common to all.  A public nuisance is a crime.
         other words negligence. There may be several such wrongs
                                                                 However, if an individual can show he has suffered
         for which the firm may be held responsible, such as private
                                                                 special damage above that suffered by public, he will
         nuisance and industrial accidents.
                                                                 succeed in civil action.
         Absolute and strict Liability Strict liability       Private nuisance;
         (Torts such as those involving ultra-hazardous materials  Y  Unauthorised act or omission, which interferes with the
         those are dangerous in and of themselves)               enjoyment of land only a person who has an interest
                                                                 so affected may bring an action,(smells/smokes/fumes/
         Liability is imposed regardless of negligence or fault and it  noise/ which cause material damage to property or


                                                                            The Insurance Times, May 2019 23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28