Page 14 - Banking Finance June 2017
P. 14

LEGAL UPDATE





         LEGAL





                                                                               CASES
                                                                               CASES
                                                                               CASES
                                                                               CASES
                                                                               CASES








           Tax liability after amal-        Business Correspondence is not binding
                                            The Supreme Court sets aside the judgment of the Madras High Court and two
           gamation                                           lower courts in a dispute between Vedanta Ltd and Emir-
           McDowell Co vs. CIT: The sick com-                 ates Trading Agency, ruling that there was no concluded
           pany, Hindustan Polymers Ltd (HPL),                contract between the parties.
           was amalgamated with McDowell.
                                                              Emirates wanted phosphoric acid from Vedanta and com-
                              HPL owed a                      munications followed over the quantity and duration of sup-
                              lot of money
                                                              ply. It also bid in response to the international tender pub-
                              to banks and                    lished by Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation as-
                              financial in-                   suming that the supplies will be available from Vedanta. As
                              stitutions in-  Vedanta denied of supplies, Emirates' performance guarantee was forfeited and
                              cluding       it suffered other losses.
           waiver of interest. Invoking Section
           72A of the Income Tax Act, the in-  The breach of contracts was accepted in lower courts Vedanta had told the dis-
           terest was shown as expenditure by  trict judge and appellate courts that there were only communications regarding
           HPL. According to that provision, the  proposals and counter-proposals but they were not accepted and hence no con-
           company which takes over the sick  tract was signed, stamped and confirmed. But those courts did not agree.
           company is allowed to set off losses  Vedanta appealed to the Supreme Court reiterating its stand which was ac-
           of the amalgamated company as its  cepted.
           own losses, subject to certain condi-
           tions.                           Over 300 cases under Benami Act
           The assessing officer treated the in-  After demonetization, the Prime Minister in a recent meeting had directed the
           come at the hands of the company  tax department to take stringent action against
           and adjusted it from the accumu-  benami owners who were identified during Op-
                                            eration Clean Money.
           lated losses. McDowell challenged it
           before the tribunal which ruled in its  Operation Clean Money is the government's on-
           favor, stating income was that of  going exercise, aimed to detect black money gen-
           HPL, which was a different entity.  eration in the system, after demonetization. Act-
           But the Karnataka High Court held  ing on the directive, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has constituted 30 special
           that the tribunal was wrong in treat-  units in 16 jurisdictions. The special unit will comprise four I-T officials headed by
           ing the waiver of interest as not in-  additional commissioner of the respective zone.
           come of McDowell. The company's
                                            According to sources, the tax department has identified over 300 cases which
           appeal was dismissed.
                                            could face action under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act.

            14 | 2017 | JUNE                                                               | BANKING FINANCE








                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19