Page 15 - Banking Finance June 2017
P. 15

LEGAL UPDATE


           Apex court finds it cor-         Civil suit stands back for arbitration
           rect to connect PAN              When an agreement is terminated by one party alleging breach committed by the
                                                                 other, the arbitration clause still survives and continues
           with Aadhaar                                          to be operative. This is particularly so when the contract

           According to the latest Finance Bill,                 is revoked by mutual consent and the arbitration clause
                              the    PAN                         is framed in general terms, as stated by the Supreme
                              should be                          Court in the case of Hema Khattar Vs Shiv Khera, while
                              linked with                        setting aside the ruling of the Delhi High Court.
                              Aadhaar       There was an agreement to reconstruct a building between the two parties.
                              Card to con-  The land owner found out that the construction was faulty and the agreement
                              tinue to be   was terminated. The owner named a sole arbitrator invoking the arbitration
           active. The Supreme Court has men-  clause, but the builder moved the high court in a civil suit claiming dues and
           tioned that there was nothing prima  other points. The owner opposed it on the ground of the arbitration clause.
           facie wrong with the Modi        The high court, however, proceeded on the line of the suit. On appeal, the Su-
           government's insistence on linking  preme Court quashed the orders of the high court and allowed the sole arbitra-
           Permanent Account Number (PAN)
           of citizens with their Aadhaar num-  tor named by the owner to decide the issues.
           bers to check the endemic problem  Courts not to interfere in Govt's discretion
           of tax evasion.                  Section 11C of the Central Excise Act empowers the government to issue or not
           The government, through its top-  to issue a notification exempting units if there was a "gen-
           most legal officer, Attorney General  erally prevalent practice". The petition was filed by a
           for India Mukul Rohatgi, defended  manufacturer of rosin and turpentine and it demanded
           the move as necessary to weed out  a notification claiming that it fulfilled the conditions for
           fake PANs and check tax evasion and  getting exemption, namely, it used a manual method
           black money.                     without using power and such procedure was exempted
                                            from duties in other cases.
           SC whittled penalising
                                            The Supreme Court rejected the contention and stated
           powers of Competition            there was no such general practice obliging the government to issue a notifica-

           Commission (CCI)                 tion. It states that "unless it is made with oblique end or extraneous purposes or
                                            upon extraneous considerations, or arbitrarily, without applying its mind to the
           The Supreme Court cuts competition
                                            relevant considerations, or where it is not guided by any norms which are rel-
           commission's                     evant to the object to be achieved". The court stated so while dismissing the
           penal powers
                                            appeal case, Mangalam Organics Ltd vs. Union of India, against the order of the
           by an order                      Delhi High Court.
           mentioning
           that penalties                   Validity of ship's registration
           imposed by the CCI on companies  Halliburton Offshore Services Inc vs. Mercantile Marine Department: The Su-
           should be only on the turnover rel-                   preme Court has ruled that a provisional certificate of
           evant to a case in dispute, not their                 registration of a ship has validity only for six months or
           overall turnover. The same was de-                    till the ship arrives at an Indian port for registration. If
           cided by the Apex Court on an ap-                     the ship is in the territory of another country where
           peal where CCI had imposed 9% pen-                    there is an Indian consul, he can grant temporary reg-
           alty on the average of 3 years' turn-                 istration but it will mandatorily expire within six months
           over of each Company involved. In-  or when it arrives in a port where it can get registration.
           volved parties were Excel Crop,
           United Phosphorus and Sandhya Or-  The conditions for temporary and permanent registration are the same and they
                                            are meant to develop the shipping industry, the Supreme Court stated in its judg-
           ganic Chemicals,
                                            ment in the case.

            BANKING FINANCE |                                                                 JUNE | 2017 | 15








                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20