Page 116 - A Banker Down the Rabbit Hole
P. 116

The next day, I wanted to meet the guarantor. The borrowers appeared
           nervous. I asked them what relationship the female guarantor had with
           the borrower. They said no relationship but she was wife of one of their
           family friends. It could be possible but it was difficult to digest for me
           that a friend's wife would agree so easily to stand guarantor for loan
           worth several crores of rupees to a trading firm and mortgage her
           property. I had already got vigilant on their conduct while inspecting the
           property. I had my doubts whether the female guarantor was properly
           briefed about the purpose of her signatures on bank documents and her
           liability for the loan. I told them, "I would like to meet the guarantor in
           person before proceeding further to ascertain that she understands this
           transaction and the nature of her liability."


           The next day, they came and offered an alternative guarantor with
           substantial worth. Now this appeared to be a possible case of
           misrepresentation of facts to the earlier proposed guarantor. Many times,
           the borrowers who are normally friends or relatives of the guarantors
           request them to be a witness on the loan documents to be signed by
           the borrower for a bank loan whereas actually the document is a
           guarantee agreement. This is case of misrepresentation of facts to the
           guarantor. Later, when the borrower defaults, the bank goes after the
           guarantor also. The general stand taken by the guarantor is that he had
           not signed any guarantee for the loan but was only a witness on loan
           documents or takes the plea that the bank should recover the amount
           from the assets of the borrower first and if still some amount is payable,
           he would pay later.


           Liability of a guarantor as per law
           I made a very peculiar observation during these episodes. It was a general
           notion that guarantor has to pay up only when bank is not able to recover
           from the personal assets of the borrower or assets of the firm of the
           borrower. That is not true; the bank can recover the dues from the
           borrower or the guarantor or both.



                                         A Banker down the Rabbit Hole | 113
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121