Page 26 - Insurance Times June 2019
P. 26

Although Section 42 CMV Rules, 1989, categorically forbids  rupees, as may be prescribed under sub-section (13);
          a holder of a trade certificate to deliver a motor vehicle to  Provided that action under section. Thus, we find that the
          a purchaser without registration, whether temporary or  provision of MV Act only levies some punitive fine.
          permanent, the provisions under section 47 of CMV Rules
          1989, allows applicant to apply for registration of a motor  Take another scenario, a new vehicle was stolen from the
          vehicle before the registering authority within a period of  garage of the purchaser which was not a public place in any
          seven days from the date of taking delivery of such vehicle,  case. Can we deny the claim just because there was no
          excluding the period of journey.                    certificate of registration? The answer is no.


          The dealers take advantage of this exemption and use the  It may be noted here that mere violations of MV Act
          leeway of seven days from the date of delivery to apply for  provisions in many cases, do not jeopardize an insurance
          registration. What would happen to a motor claim that  claim. Certain MV Act provision like section 147 has been
          arises in the interim period when in the first place, an  incorporated in the certificate of insurance to safeguard the
          application has been made to a Registering Authority but  interests of victims of road accidents in arising out of
          no certificate of Registration has been  issued or in the  accidents.
          second place, no application is made at all due to holidays
          or for some other reasons, although the vehicle has already  Even cases, involving the violation of Limitation to Use
          been sold?                                          which states that the company shall not be liable under this
                                                              policy in respect of 3(a) being used otherwise than in
          As per Section 48 CMV Rules, 1989, which deals with the  accordance with the Limitation As to Use, some claims can
          issue of certificate of registration - the registering authority  be paid by way of a compromise settlement.
          may  take  a  period  30  days  or  less  on  receipt  of  an
          application under rule 47 and after verification of the  A close look of condition 8 of Motor policy which states,"
          documents  furnished  with  it  to  issue a  certificate  of  The due observance and fulfillment of the terms, conditions
          Registration.  Therefore,  the  issuance of certificate  of  and endorsements of this policy in so far as they relate to
          Registration is not spontaneous and takes time. No claim  be done or complied with by the insured and the truth of
          can be denied just because, there  is no  certificate of  the statements and answers in the said proposal shall be
          registration in the interim period.                 condition precedent to any liability of the company to make
                                                              any payments under this policy" makes the above payment
          In any case this is a violation of provisions of MV Act,1988
                                                              possible.
          under section 41(11) which stipulates that if the owner fails
          to make an application under sub-section (1) of the above  The implication of this condition is that it makes all terms,
          section, or, as the case may be, under sub-section (8) within  conditions and endorsements condition precedent to liability.
          the period prescribed, the registering authority may, having  It means it only makes that particular claim voidable without
          regard to the circumstances of the case, require the owner  affecting other claims or the policy. If the violation is
          to pay, in lieu of any action that may be taken against him  substantially material, the claim is not payable at all but the
          under section 177, such amount not exceeding one hundred  same lapse is materially insignificant, as matter of good
                                                              commercial practice, should be paid with compromise
                                                              settlement without prejudice (without creating a precedent).

                                                              Reference:-
                                                              1.  THE CENTRAL MOTOR VEHICLES RULES, 1989-http://
                                                                 www.tn.gov.in/sta/Cmvr1989.pdf
                                                              2.  THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT,  1988-http://www.tn.gov.in/
                                                                 sta/Mvact1988.pdf
                                                              3.  Principles of Risk Management and Insurance, 13th
                                                                 Edition; George E. Rejda, Emeritus; University of Nebraska
                                                                 and Michael McNamara, Washington State Universit,
                                                                 ©2017 , Pearson;https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-
                                                                 education/program/Rejda-Principles-of-Risk-Management-
                                                                 and-Insurance-13th-Edition/PGM86481.html
          26  The Insurance Times, June 2019
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31