Page 110 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 110

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   identities seemed to merge closely with those of Quetzalcoatl. One was
                   Votan, a great civilizer, who was also described as pale-skinned, bearded
                   and wearing a long robe. Scholars could offer no translation for his name
                   but his principal symbol, like that of Quetzalcoatl, was a serpent.
                                                                                                         5
                   Another closely related figure was Itzamana, the Mayan god of healing,
                   who was a robed and bearded individual; his symbol, too, was the
                   rattlesnake.
                                 6
                     What emerged from all this, as the leading authorities agreed, was that
                   the Mexican legends collected and passed on by Spanish chroniclers at
                   the time of the conquest were often the confused and conflated products
                   of extremely long oral traditions. Behind them all, however, it seemed
                   that there must lie some solid historical reality. In the judgement of
                   Sylvanus Griswold Morley, the doyen of Maya studies:

                      The great god Kukulkan, or Feathered Serpent, was the Mayan counterpart of the
                      Aztec Quetzalcoatl, the Mexican god  of  light,  learning and  culture.  In the  Maya
                      pantheon he  was  regarded as  having  been the great organizer, the founder  of
                      cities, the  former of  laws  and the teacher of the calendar.  Indeed his attributes
                      and life history are so human that it is not improbable that he may have been an
                      actual historical character,  some great  lawgiver and organizer, the memory  of
                      whose  benefactions lingered long after death,  and whose personality  was
                      eventually deified.
                                        7
                   All        the         legends          stated          unambiguously             that
                   Quetzalcoatl/Kukulkan/Gucumatz/Votan/Itzamana had arrived in Central
                   America from somewhere very far away (across the ‘Eastern Sea’) and that
                   amid great sadness he had eventually sailed off again in the direction
                   whence he had come.  The legends added that he had promised solemnly
                                            8
                   that he would return one day —a clear echo of Viracocha it would be
                                                        9
                   almost perverse to ascribe to coincidence. In addition, it will be recalled
                   that Viracocha’s departure across the waves of the Pacific Ocean had
                   been portrayed in the Andean traditions as a miraculous event.
                   Quetzalcoatl’s departure from Mexico also had a strange feel about it: he
                   was said to have sailed away ‘on a raft of serpents’.
                                                                               10
                     All in all, I felt Morley was right  in looking for  a factual historical
                   background behind the Mayan and Mexican myths. What the traditions
                   seemed to indicate was that the bearded pale-skinned foreigner called
                   Quetzalcoatl (or Kukulkan or whatever) had been not just one person but
                   probably several people who had come from the same place and had
                   belonged to the same distinctively non-Indian ethnic type (bearded,
                   white-skinned, etc.). This wasn’t only suggested by the existence of a


                   5  Fair Gods and Stone Faces, pp. 98-9.
                   6  Ibid, p. 100.
                   7   Sylvanus Griswold Morley,  An Introduction  to  the Study of Maya  Hieroglyphs
                   (introduction by Eric S. Thompson), Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1975, pp. 16-17.
                     New Larousse Encyclopaedia of Mythology, Paul Hamlyn, London, 1989, pp. 437, 439.
                   8
                   9  Ibid., p. 437.
                   10  Fair Gods and Stone Faces, p. 62.


                                                                                                     108
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115