Page 169 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 169

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   that a ‘Sirius-Pleides axis’ could also have played a part.  And Stansbury
                                                                                       5
                   Hagar (secretary of the Department of Ethnology at the Brooklyn Institute
                   of the Arts and Sciences), had suggested that the street might represent
                   the Milky Way.
                                    6
                     Indeed Hagar went further than this, seeing the portrayal of specific
                   planets and stars in many of the pyramids, mounds and other structures
                   that hovered like fixed satellites around the axis of the Street of the
                   Dead. His complete thesis was that Teotihuacan had been designed as a
                   kind of ‘map of heaven’: ‘It reproduced on earth a supposed celestial plan
                   of the sky-world where dwelt the deities and spirits of the dead.’
                                                                                              7
                     During the 1960s and 1970s Hagar’s intuitions were tested in the field
                   by Hugh Harleston Jr., an American engineer resident in Mexico, who
                   carried out a comprehensive mathematical survey at Teotihuacan.
                   Harleston reported his findings in October 1974 at the International
                   Congress of Americanists.  His paper, which was full of daring and
                                                   8
                   innovative ideas, contained some particularly curious information about
                   the Citadel and about the Temple of Quetzalcoatl located at the eastern
                   extreme of this great square compound.
                     The Temple was regarded by scholars as one of the best-preserved
                   archaeological monuments in Central America.  This was because the
                                                                            9
                   original, prehistoric structure had been partially buried beneath another
                   much later mound immediately in front  of it to the west. Excavation of
                   that mound had revealed the elegant six-stage pyramid that now
                   confronted me. It stood 72 feet high and its base covered an area of
                   82,000 square feet.
                     Still bearing traces of the original multicoloured paints which had
                   coated it in antiquity, the exposed Temple was a beautiful and strange
                   sight. The predominant sculptural motif  was a series of  huge serpent
                   heads protruding three-dimensionally out of the facing blocks and lining
                   the sides of the massive central stairway. The elongated jaws of these
                   oddly humanoid reptiles were heavily endowed with fangs, and the upper
                   lips with a sort of handlebar moustache. Each serpent’s thick neck was
                   ringed by an elaborate plume of feathers—the unmistakable symbol of
                   Quetzalcoatl.
                                  10
                     What Harleston’s investigations had shown was that a complex
                   mathematical relationship appeared to exist among the principal
                   structures lined up along the Street of the Dead (and indeed beyond it).
                   This relationship suggested something extraordinary, namely that
                   Teotihuacan might originally have  been designed as a precise scale-

                   5  Beyond Stonehenge, pp. 187-8.
                   6  Cited in Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids, pp. 220-1.
                   7  Ibid.
                   8  Hugh Harleston  Jr., ‘A Mathematical  Analysis of  Teotihuacan’, XLI International
                   Congress of Americanists, 3 October 1974.
                   9  Richard Bloomgarden, The Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Editur S. A. Mexico, 1993, p. 14.
                   10  Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids, p. 215.


                                                                                                     167
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174