Page 273 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 273

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                   figures did not do justice to the enormous care and skill required to
                   achieve them. I knew, too, that scholars had not yet come up with a
                   convincing explanation of exactly how the Pyramid builders had adhered
                   consistently to such high standards of precision.
                                                                            3
                     What really interested me, however, was the even bigger question-mark
                   over another issue: why had they imposed such exacting standards on
                   themselves? If they had permitted a margin of error of 1-2 per cent—
                   instead of less than one-tenth of 1 per cent—they could have simplified
                   their tasks with no apparent loss of quality. Why hadn’t they done so?
                   Why had they insisted on making everything so difficult? Why, in short, in
                   a supposedly ‘primitive’ stone monument built more than 4500 years ago
                   were we seeing this strange, obsessional adherence to machine-age
                   standards of precision?



                   Black hole in history

                   Our plan was to climb the Great Pyramid—something that had been
                   strictly illegal since 1983  when the messy falls of several foolhardy
                   tourists had forced the government of Egypt to impose a ban. I realized
                   that we were being foolhardy too (particularly in attempting the climb at
                   night) and I didn’t feel good about breaking what was basically a sensible
                   law. By this stage, however, my intense interest in the Pyramid, and my
                   desire to learn everything I could about it, had over-ridden my common
                   sense.
                     Now, after parting company with the guard patrol at the north-eastern
                   corner of the monument, we continued to make our way surreptitiously
                   along the eastern face towards the south-eastern corner.
                     There were dense shadows among the twisted and broken paving
                   stones that separated the Great Pyramid from the three much smaller
                   ‘subsidiary’ pyramids lying immediately to its east. There were also three
                   deep and narrow rock-cut pits which resembled giant graves. These had
                   been found empty by the archaeologists who had excavated them, but
                   were shaped as though they had been intended to enclose the hulls of
                   high-prowed, streamlined boats.
                     Roughly halfway along the Pyramid’s eastern face we encountered
                   another patrol. This time it consisted of two guards, one of whom must
                   have been eighty years old. His companion, a teenager with pustulant
                   acne, informed us that the money Ali had paid was insufficient and that
                   fifty more Egyptian pounds would be  required if we were to proceed. I
                   already had the notes in my hand and gave them to the lad without delay.
                   I was past caring how much this was costing; I just wanted to make the
                   climb and get down and away before dawn without being arrested.

                   3  The conventional  explanations,  as given in The Pyramids of Egypt, for example,  are
                   entirely unsatisfactory, as Edwards himself admits; see pp. 85-7, 206-41.



                                                                                                     271
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278