Page 73 - Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock
P. 73

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS



                       included examples of Hippocampus (the seahorse).  In addition, as one
                                                                                  4
                       authority has pointed out, ‘The various species of Allorquestes
                       (hyalella inermis, etc.) and other examples of marine fauna leave no
                       doubt that this lake in other periods was much saltier than today, or,
                       more accurately, that the water which formed it was from the sea and
                       that it was damned up and locked in the Andes when the continent
                       rose.’
                             5
                   3  So much, then, for the events which may have created Lake Titicaca in
                       the first place. Since its formation this great ‘interior sea’, and the
                       Altiplano itself, has undergone several other drastic and dramatic
                       changes. Of these by far the most notable is that the lake’s extent
                       appears to have fluctuated enormously, indicated by the existence of
                       an ancient strandline visible on much of the surrounding terrain.
                       Puzzlingly, this strandline is not level but slopes markedly from north
                       to south over a considerable horizontal distance. At the northernmost
                       point surveyed it is as much as 295 feet higher than Titicaca; some
                       400 miles farther south, it is 274 feet lower than the present level of
                       the lake.  From this, and much other evidence, geologists have
                                 6
                       deduced that the Altiplano is still gradually rising, but in an
                       unbalanced manner with greater altitudes being attained in the
                       northern part and lesser in the southern. The process involved here is
                       thought to have less to do with changes in the level of Titicaca’s
                       waters themselves (although such changes have certainly occurred)
                       than with changes in the level of the whole terrain in which the lake is
                       situated.
                                 7
                   4  Much harder to explain in such terms, however, given the very long
                       time periods major geological transformations are supposed to
                       require, is irrefutable evidence that the city of Tiahuanaco was once a
                       port, complete with extensive docks, positioned right on the shore of
                       Lake Titicaca.  The problem is that Tiahuanaco’s ruins are now
                                       8
                       marooned about twelve miles south of the lake and more than 100
                       feet higher than the present shoreline.  In the period since the city was
                                                                    9
                       built, it therefore follows that one of two things must have happened:
                       either the level of lake has fallen greatly or the land on which
                       Tiahuanaco stands has risen comparably.
                   5  Either way it is obvious that there have been massive and traumatic

                   4  Tiahuanacu, J. J. Augustin, New York, 1945, volume I, p. 28.
                   5  Ibid.
                   6  See, for example, H.S. Bellamy, Built Before the Flood: The Problem of the Tiahuanaco
                   Ruins, Faber & Faber, London, 1943, p. 57.
                   7  Ibid., p. 59.
                   8   Tiahuanacu,  III, pp. 192-6. See  also  Bolivia,  Lonely  Planet Publications, Hawthorne,
                   Australia, 1992, p. 156.
                   9  Ibid. See  also Harold Osborne,  Indians of  the Andes: Aymaras  and Quechuas,
                   Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1952, p. 55.



                                                                                                      71
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78