Page 261 - Libro 2
P. 261

 15 — Duplex Imaging of the Upper Extremity Venous System
 241
 2. You are asked to perform an examination on a patient with a dressing in place over the subclavicular region on the shoulder. What specifically can you do to provide adequate information for determining upper extremity venous system patency?
3. You are examining a patient for an upper extremity venous thrombosis. You notice several dilated chest wall veins. The spectral Doppler signals from both subclavian and internal jugular veins are antegrade but continuous. What is the likely cause of these findings?
REFERENCES
1. Bernardi E, Pesavento R, Prandoni P. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Semin Thromb. 2006;32(7):729–736.
2. Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Haim N, et al. Prevalence of upper extremity deep venous thrombo- sis diagnosed by color Doppler duplex sonography in cancer patients with central venous catheters. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(10):1297–1303.
3. Talbot SR. B-mode evaluation of peripheral veins. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1988;9(4): 295–319.
4. Sullivan ED, Peters BS, Cranley JJ. Real-time B-mode venous ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 1984; 1(3):465–471.
5. Oliver MA. Duplex scanning in venous disease. Bruit. 1985;9:206–209.
6. Talbot SR, Oliver MA. Techniques of Venous Imaging. Pasadena, CA: Appleton Davies; 1992.
7. Hartshorne T, Goss D. Duplex assessment of deep vein thrombosis and upper limb disor-
ders. In: Thrush A, Hartshore T, eds. Vascular Ultrasound: How, Why and When. 3rd ed.
Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2010:233–253.
8. Selis JE, Kadakia S. Venous Doppler sonography of the extremities: a window to pathology
of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roent. 2009;193(5):1446–1451.
9. Qaseem A, Snow V, Barry P, et al. Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the
American College of Physicians. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(1):57–62.
10. Czihal M, Hoffman U. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Vasc Med. 2011;16(3):
191–202.















































































   259   260   261   262   263