Page 310 - Libro 2

290
PART 5 — ABDOMINAL
21. Wolf YG, Johnson BL, Hill BB, et al. Duplex ultrasound scanning versus computed tomo- graphic angiography for postoperative evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneu- rysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:1142–1148.
22. Zannetti S, De Rango P, Parente B, et al. Role of Duplex scan in endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:531–535.
23. Carter KA, Gayle RG, DeMasi RJ, et al. The incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5 year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg.
2003;35:595–597.
24. May J, Harris JP, Kidd JF, et al. Imaging modalities for the diagnosis of endoleak. In: Man-
sour M, Labropoulos N, eds. Vascular Diagnosis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:
407–419.
25. Berdejo GL, Lipsitz E. Ultrasound imaging assessment following endovascular aortic
aneurysm repair. In: Zweibel W, Pellerito J, eds. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography.
5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005;553–570.
26. Nelms C, Carter K, DeMasi R, et al. Color duplex ultrasound characteristics: can we predict
aortic aneurysm expansion following endovascular repair? J Vasc Ultrasound. 2005;29(3):
143–146.
27. White GH, May J, Petrasek P, et al. Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth
after successful endoluminal repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:308–315.
28. Busch K, Kidd JF, White GH, et al. What are the duplex ultrasound signs that characterize an “unstable abdominal aortic aneurysm sac” after endograft implantation? J Vasc Ultra-
sound. 2007;31(3):143–146.