Page 143 - The Social Animal
P. 143

Social Cognition 125


             b. Tasti-burger: a hamburger that is rated very good on taste but
                only average on nutrition [exactly as described in the control
                condition].
              c. Bummer-burger: a hamburger that is rated only good on taste
                and only average on nutrition.
               No reasonable person would select the Bummer-burger; it is nei-
           ther as nutritious as the Nutri-burger nor as flavorful as the Tasti-
           burger. But even though no one chose it, putting the Bummer-burger
           on the menu had an effect; significantly more people in this condition
           chose the Tasti-burger over the Nutri-burger. How did a worthless
           burger create such a clear preference? The answer in a nutshell is: the
           contrast effect. In contrast to the Bummer-burger, the Tasti-burger
           looked great. When any object is contrasted with something similar
           but not as good (or pretty, or tall, etc.), that particular object is judged
           to be better, prettier, and taller than would normally be the case. For
           example,if a man of normal height (say,5 feet 11 inches) is in the com-
           pany of midgets, he seems very tall. If he is a member of a professional
           basketball team, he seems very short. Some of you may recall a young
           man who played basketball for the Boston Celtics several years ago
           named “Tiny” Archibald. Would it surprise you to learn that “Tiny”
           stood 6 feet 1 inch tall? In Jonathan Swift’s classic novel Gulliver’s
           Travels,the hero, a man of normal height, was considered a giant when
           traveling among the residents of Lilliput, and a dwarf when traveling
           among the residents of Brobdingnag. This is the contrast effect.
               One of my favorite examples of the contrast effect was produced
                                                                 12
           in an experiment by Douglas Kenrick and Sara Gutierres, who
           asked male college students to rate the attractiveness of a potential
           blind date before or after watching an episode of the popular televi-
           sion show Charlie’s Angels. (As you may recall, the “angels” were ex-
           traordinarily attractive young women.) The males rated their blind
           date as far less attractive after they saw the show than before. The
           “angels” provided a stringent context for rating attractiveness; almost
           anyone would suffer by contrast.
               Contrast effects can occur subtly and can have powerful effects.
           A used-car dealer may place an old clunker on the lot to “improve
           the appearance” of the autos in its immediate vicinity. A presidential
           candidate may select a vice-presidential running mate of lesser
           stature to enhance the positive perception of his or her own
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148