Page 278 - The Social Animal
P. 278

260 The Social Animal


           likely to respond in a receptive and understanding manner than those
           located in the North.
               Taking these findings into account, we would conclude that, al-
           though an instinctual component of aggression is almost certainly
           present in human beings and other primates, aggression is not caused
           entirely by instinct. There are clear examples that show how cultural
           influences shape our responses to situational and social events, and
           thereby determine whether we will respond aggressively. Even more
           important, we know that in human beings, such behavior can be
           modified by situational and social factors. In short, aggressive behav-
           ior can be reduced.



           Is Aggression Useful?

           The Survival of the Fittest Okay, aggression in humans can
           be reduced, but should it be? Some investigators have suggested that
           aggression might be useful and perhaps even necessary. Konrad
                  18
           Lorenz, for example, has argued that aggression is “an essential part
           of the life-preserving organization of instincts.” Basing his argument
           on nonhumans, he sees aggression as being of prime evolutionary
           importance, allowing the young animals to have the strongest and
           smartest mothers and fathers and enabling the group to be led by the
           best possible leaders. From their study of Old World monkeys, an-
           thropologist Sherwood Washburn and psychiatrist David Hamburg
           concur. They find that aggression within the same group of mon-
                  19
           keys plays an important role in feeding, reproduction, and determin-
           ing dominance patterns. The strongest and most aggressive male in
           a colony will assume a dominant position through an initial display
                                                         20
           of aggressive behavior. Ironically, as Steven Pinker has observed,
           this serves to reduce subsequent serious fighting within the colony
           because the other males know who is boss and simply back off. Fur-
           thermore, because the dominant male is responsible for a large pro-
           portion of reproduction, the colony increases its chances of survival
           as the strong male passes on his vigor to subsequent generations.
               The pattern of behavior among elephant seals is similar—but a
           bit more bloody. According to psychobiologist Burney LeBoeuf, 21
           every year before mating season, pairs of males square off against
           each other to establish dominance. The strongest, most aggressive,
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283