Page 52 - The Social Animal
P. 52

34 The Social Animal


               It should be noted that, if the people were given a placebo (that
           is, an injection of a benign solution that produces no symptoms), or
           if they were forewarned about the symptoms of the drug that they
           had been given, they were relatively unaffected by the antics of the
           stooge. To sum up this experiment: When physical reality was clear
           and explainable, the participants’ emotions were not greatly influ-
           enced by the behavior of other people. However, when they were ex-
           periencing a strong physiological response, the origins of which were
           not clear, they interpreted their own feelings as either anger or eu-
           phoria, depending on the behavior of other people who supposedly
           were in the same chemical boat.

           Social Influence: Life and Death As we have seen, the influence
           of other people, whether intentional or not, can have an important
           effect on a person’s behavior. Unless we understand how this process
           works, these effects can have major unwanted consequences for so-
           ciety, as well. An investigation by Craig Haney into the death quali-
           fication procedure provides an interesting and instructive example. 32
           Basically, the death qualification procedure refers to the process
           whereby, in selecting a jury for a murder trial, prospective jurors who
           are opposed to the death penalty are systematically excluded from the
           jury. This procedure takes place in the presence of those people who
           are eventually selected to serve on the jury. Haney, who is both an at-
           torney and a social psychologist, reasoned that it is possible that
           when jurors who believe in capital punishment witness others being
           dismissed because they oppose the death penalty, this may subtly
           suggest to them that the law disapproves of people who oppose the
           death penalty.This conclusion may increase their tendency to impose
           the death penalty. To test this notion, Haney performed an experi-
           ment in which a random sample of adults was shown a videotape of
           a convincing jury selection procedure filmed in the moot courtroom
           of a law school—a highly realistic setting complete with all the
           courtroom accouterments. Experienced trial lawyers served as pros-
           ecutor, defense attorney, and judge on the videotape. In one condi-
           tion, the procedure included a segment on death qualification; in the
           other condition (control), this segment did not appear. Compared
           with people in the control condition, those who viewed the death
           qualification segment were more convinced of the defendant’s guilt,
           believed it was more likely that he would receive the death penalty,
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57