Page 309 - Through New Eyes
P. 309

NOTES TO PAGES 259-269                  311


           Chapter 18 – The New World
             1. Theologians sometimes use “Old Covenant” to refer to the Mosaic covenant.
               There is truth to this in that the Mosaic covenant published most fully the dis-
               tinctive character of the Adamic covenant under curse. Yet, ultimately, the Old
               Covenant is the covenant of the original garden of Eden. Ultimately there are
               two covenants, Old and New. There are two Adams, Adam and Jesus. There
               are two heavens and earth, the first in Adam and the second in Christ. See my
               discussion of this in Jordan,  The Law of the Covenant: An Exposition of Exodus 21-23
               (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1984), pp. 196-198.
            2. On this see Vern S. Poythress, Understanding the Law of Moses  (forthcoming),
               Appendix: “Does the Greek Word Pleroo sometimes mean ‘Confirm’?”.
            3. In my book The Law of the Couenant (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Eco-
               nomics, 1984), I took a different view of these verses, arguing that the passing of
               the heavens and earth is the end of the physical world, and that Christians are
               still supposed to keep the “fundamental principles” of the jots and tittles. I find
               that this interpretation, though it has weighty advocates, simply will not stand
               up in the light of the work presented in the present book as a whole. Thus, I
               must differ with so fine a work as John Murray, Principles of Condud (Grand
               Rapids: Eerdmans, 1957), pp. 149ff. Murray simply does not take sufficient ac-
               count of the redemptive historical setting of this passage, though his ethical ex-
               hortations are surely invaluable all the same. Let me direct the reader to an
               older work, equal] y Reformed and profound, that sets out what I now take to
               be the correct view of the passage: John Brown,  Discourses and Sayings of  Our Lord
              Jesm Chrid, 3 vols.  (London: Banner of Truth Trust, [1852] 1967) 1:171-174.
            4. In non-Christian thought, including that of some liberal and “neo-orthodox”
               theologians, a paradox is a real contradiction that expresses a contradiction in
               “ultimate reality.” This is not the Christian view. There is no contradiction in
               God, but God sometimes presents us with contradictions in order to goad us to
               wisdom.
            5. Matthew 16:19 says “whatever you shall bind on earth shall have been bound in
               heaven, and whatever you shall loose on earth shall have been loosed in
               heaven.” These future passives have the force of commands: Be sure you don’t
               loose anything on earth unless you know it has already been loosed in heaven.
               And how shall we know? By the Scriptures.
            6. The book of Revelation portrays the world-shaking power of church prayer and
               discipline. See James B. Jordan,  Revelation Made Practical, a set of six tapes with
               a thirty-seven-page syllabus, available from Biblical Horizons, P. O. Box
               132011, Tyler, TX 75713.
            7. Remans 12:1. Baptism washes us and makes us clean sacrifices. Then, week by
               week as “we eat the body and drink the blood” of Christ, we are transformed
               into the image of His sacrificial life and resurrected power. Also, week by week
               the sword of His Word sacrifices and resurrects us (Hebrews  4:12-13).
            8. Arthur W. Pink, Exposition of the Gospel ofJohn, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids: Zonder-
               van, 1945) 3:273.
            9. According to John 20:7, the head cloth in which Jesus had been wrapped was
               separate from the linen wrappings of the body. This shows that Jesus had sim-
               ply passed through them without undoing them, It is also possible, however, to
               correlate this with the fact that the Tabernacle was  real] y two tents. The veil be-
               tween the Holy Place (body) and the Most Holy (head, heart) acted to form two
               tents.
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314