Page 311 - Through New Eyes
P. 311

NOTES TO PAGES 278-288                  313

           19. This matter is briefly discussed in Chilton,  Days OJ V2ngeance, pp. 86-89; and see
              also Eugenio  Corsini, The Apoca@e: The Perennial Revelation of Jesus Christ,
              trans. and ed. Francis J. Moloney (Wilmington: Michael Glazier, Inc., 1983),
              pp. 104-111. It is interesting that Corsini, Chilton, and I each came up with this
              scheme separately at different times, and our schemes are virtually identical.

          Chapter 19- The Course of History

            1. This is the third and fullest version of the hymn, designed for processional use.
              The first version, seven stanzas, dates from 1866. A five-stanza version dates
              from 1868, and it is on this one that most hymnals draw. Text and information
              from John Julian, ed.,  A Dictionay of Hymnology,  2 vols. (New York: Dover
              Pub. , [1907] 1957) 2:1146-1147.
            2. On the pervasiveness of “postmillennialism” in previous centuries, and the rise
              of “amillennialism”  and “premillennialism” in recent years, see J. A. De  Jong,
              As the Water~ Cover the Seas: Millennial Expectations in the Rise of Anglo-American Mis-
              sions, 1640-1810 (Kampen, The Netherlands: J. H. Kok, 1970); Iain Murray,
              The Puritan Hope: A Study in Revival and the Interpretation of Prophecy (London: The
              Banner of Truth Tmst, 1971); Gary North, ed.,  The Journal  of Christian Recon-
              struction 111:2,  “Symposium on the Millennium” (Winter 1976-77), especially the
              essays by Greg L. Bahnsen, “The Prima Facie Acceptability of Postmillen-
              nialism,” and James B. Jordan, “A  Survey of Southern Presbyterian Millennial
              Views before 1930”; and Gary DeMar and Peter Leithart, The Reduction of Chris-
              tiani~: An Answer to Dave Hunt (Fort Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1988), esp.
              pp. 206-299.
           3. Leaven is not a symbol of evil in the Bible, but a symbol of growth. We want to
              avoid the old growth-principle of Egyptian and Pharisaical leaven, but we defi-
              nitely do want the new growth-principle of Kingdom leaven. Thus, at Passover
              the old leaven was cut off, but new leaven, found in the Ho] y Land, was
              started. For proof, see Leviticus 23:17;  2:11-12; 7:13.
           4. The author’s opinion on the millennium can be found in James B. Jordan, Rev-
              elation Made Practical, six tapes with thirty-seven-page syllabus (Tyler, TX:
              Geneva Ministries, 1986). See also David Chilton,  Days of V2ngeance: An Exposi-
              tion of the Book of Revelation (Fort Worth: Dominion Press, 1987), pp. 493-529.
              Compare Revelation 20:1-2 with Matthew 16:18-19.
           5. On the rise and growth of Christianity, see Loraine Boettner,  The Millennium
              (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Pub. Co., 1957), pp. 3-108;
              Kenneth Scott Latourette,  A HistoU of Christiani~  (New York: Harper and Row,
              1975); and Latourette, A Histoy of the Expansion of Christianip,  7 vols. (Grand
              Rapids: Zondervan, 1970).
           6. A very interesting study of this, that goes into the change of symbolism in each
              era, is Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy,  Out of Revolution: Autobiography  of Mstern Man
              (Norvich, VT: Argo Books, [1938] 1966). See also Harold J. Berman,  Law and
              Revolution: The Formation of the Watern Legal Tradition (Cambridge: Harvard Uni-
              versity Press, 1983).
           7. And as I write this, the news media is filled with stories of how our “conserva-
              tive, Christian” president’s wife consults astrologers.
   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316