Page 66 - CJO_F17_GLAUCOMA_SUPPLEMENT
P. 66

C  CLINICAL RESEARCH



                  Soc U K. 1971;91:709-739.                    tous optic neuropathy. Optometry Vision Sci. 2017;94(6):654-663.
               140. SCHEIE HG. Width and pigmentation of the angle of the anterior   165. Ong LS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG. Asymmetry in optic
                  chamber: A system of grading by gonioscopy. AMA archives of   disc parameters: The blue mountains eye study. Invest Ophthalmol
                  ophthalmology. 1957;58(4):510-512.           Vis Sci. 1999;40(5):849-857.
               141.  Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Oph-  166. Trobe JD, Glaser JS, Cassady J, Herschler J, Anderson DR.
                  thalmol. 2001;45(4):265-315.                 Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol.
               142. Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Kumar RS. Fiveńyear risk of progres-  1980;98(6):1046-1050.
                  sion of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: A   167.  Lloyd MJ, Mansberger SL, Fortune BA, et al. Features of optic disc
                  populationńbased study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2003;81(5):480-485.  progression in patients with ocular hypertension and early glau-
               143. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of   coma. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(5):343-348.
                  early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure   168. Healey PR, Mitchell P. Presence of an optic disc notch and glau-
                  glaucoma (EAGLE): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet.   coma. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(4):262-266.
                  2016;388(10052):1389-1397.                169. Reis AS, Artes PH, Belliveau AC, et al. Rates of change in the visual
               144. Emanuel ME, Parrish RK,2nd, Gedde SJ. Evidence-based manage-  field and optic disc in patients with distinct patterns of glaucoma-
                  ment of primary angle closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol.   tous optic disc damage. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):294-303.
                  2014;25(2):89-92.                         170. Jonas JB, Fernández MC, Stürmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neu-
               145. Saw S, Gazzard G, Friedman DS. Interventions for angle-  roretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(1):63-68.
                  closure glaucoma: An evidence-based update. Ophthalmology.   171.  Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, Drance SM, Ferrier SN, LeBlanc RP,
                  2003;110(10):1869-1879.                      Chauhan BC. Visual field and optic disc progression in patients with
               146. Ritch R, Tham CC, Lam DS. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty   different types of optic disc damage: A longitudinal prospective
                  (ALPI): An update. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(3):279-288.  study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(11):2178-2184.
               147.  Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Ahmed I, et al. Phacoemul-  172. Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Various glaucomatous optic nerve appear-
                  sification and goniosynechialysis in the management of unrespon-  ances: Clinical correlations. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(4):640-649.
                  sive primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(3):186-189.  173. Jonas JB, Bergua A, Schmitz–Valckenberg P, Papastathopoulos
               148. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treat-  KI, Budde WM. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of
                  ment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901-1911.  glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
               149. Rao HL, Addepalli UK, Jonnadula GB, Kumbar T, Senthil S,   2000;41(7):1764-1773.
                  Garudadri CS. Relationship between intraocular pressure and   174. Greenfield DS. Glaucomatous versus nonglaucomatous optic disc
                  rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma. J Glaucoma.   cupping: Clinical differentiation. . 1999;14(2):95-108.
                  2013;22(9):719-724.                       175. Fraser CL, White AJ, Plant GT, Martin KR. Optic nerve cupping and
               150. Lichter PR. Expectations from clinical trials: Results of the early   the neuro-ophthalmologist. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013;33(4):377-389.
                  manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1371-1372.  176. Ahmed IIK, Feldman F, Kucharczyk W, Trope GE. Neuroradiologic
               151.  Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA,   screening in normal-pressure glaucoma: Study results and literature
                  Weinreb RN. Prediction of functional loss in glaucoma from   review. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(4):279-286.
                  progressive optic disc damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10):1250- 177.  Dutton G. Congenital disorders of the optic nerve: Excavations and
                  1256.                                        hypoplasia. Eye. 2004;18(11):1038-1048.
               152. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. The  178. Kotowski J, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Schuman JS. Imaging of the
                  structure and function relationship in glaucoma: Implications for   optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer: An essential part of glau-
                  detection of progression and measurement of rates of ChangeStruc-  coma diagnosis and monitoring. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59(4):458-
                  ture and function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis   467.
                  Sci. 2012;53(11):6939-6946.               179.  Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, Maumenee AE, George T. The
               153. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The ocular hyperten-  nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol.
                  sion treatment study: A randomized trial determines that topical   1977;95(12):2149-2156.
                  ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of pri-  180. Quigley HA, Addicks EM. Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber
                  mary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):701-713.  layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(5):807-814.
               154. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. The Lancet.   181.  Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve
                  2004;363(9422):1711-1720.                    fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch
               155. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann G. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal   Ophthalmol. 1991;109(1):77-83.
                  rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest   182. Jonas JB, Dichtl A. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Surv
                  Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(7):1151-1158.    Ophthalmol. 1996;40(5):369-378.
               156. Jonas JB, Papastathopoulos K. Ophthalmoscopic measurement of   183. Sommer A, Quigley HA, Robin AL, Miller NR, Katz J, Arkell S.
                  the optic disc. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(7):1102-1106.  Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment. Arch Ophthalmol.
               157.  Litwak AB. Glaucoma management and treatment. In: Anthony Lit-  1984;102(12):1766-1771.
                  wak, ed. The glaucoma handbook. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania  184. Quigley HA, Sommer A. How to use nerve fiber layer examina-
                  College of Optometry; 2001:219-238.          tion in the management of glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc.
               158. Ansari–Shahrezaei S, Maar N, Biowski R, Stur M. Biomicroscopic   1987;85:254-272.
                  measurement of the optic disc with a high-power positive lens.   185. De Moraes CG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Predictive factors within
                  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):153-157.  the optic nerve complex for glaucoma progression: Disc hemor-
               159. Spencer AF, Vernon SA. Optic disc measurement: A com-  rhage and parapapillary atrophy. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila).
                  parison of indirect ophthalmoscopic methods. Br J Ophthalmol.   2012;1(2):105-112.
                  1995;79(10):910-915.                      186. Suh M, Kim D, Kim Y, Kim T, Park K. Patterns of progression of
               160. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disk morphometry in high   localized retinal nerve fibre layer defect on red-free fundus photo-
                  myopia. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology.   graphs in normal-tension glaucoma. Eye. 2010;24(5):857-863.
                  1988;226(6):587-590.                      187.  Damji K, Friedman S, Moroi S, Rhee D. Chapter 4 - optic nerve, ret-
               161.  Quigley HA, Coleman AL, Dorman-Pease ME. Larger optic nerve   ina and choroid. In: Allingham R, ed. Shields textbook of glaucoma.
                  heads have more nerve fibers in normal monkey eyes. Arch Ophthal-  6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
                  mol. 1991;109(10):1441-1443.              188. Jonas JB, Nguyen XN, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Parapapillary cho-
               162. Yücel YH, Gupta N, Kalichman MW, et al. Relationship of optic disc   rioretinal atrophy in normal and glaucoma eyes. I. morphometric
                  topography to optic nerve fiber number in glaucoma. Arch Ophthal-  data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30(5):908-918.
                  mol. 1998;116(4):493-497.                 189. Jonas JB, Fernández MC, Naumann GO. Glaucomatous parapap-
               163. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GO. Glaucomatous optic nerve   illary atrophy: Occurrence and correlations. Arch Ophthalmol.
                  atrophy in small discs with low cup-to-disc ratios. Ophthalmology.   1992;110(2):214-222.
                  1990;97(9):1211-1215.                     190. Park KH, Tomita G, Liou SY, Kitazawa Y. Correlation between
               164. Nixon GJ, Watanabe RK, Sullivan-Mee M, DeWilde A, Young L,   peripapillary atrophy and optic nerve damage in normal-tension
                  Mitchell GL. Influence of optic disc size on identifying glaucoma-  glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(11):1899-1906.



      66             CANADIAN JOURNAL of OPTOMETRY    |    REVUE CANADIENNE D’OPTOMÉTRIE    VOL. 79  SUPPLEMENT 1, 2017
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71