Page 343 - Deception at work all chapters EBook
P. 343

292 Deception at Work

     It’s really that simple. An untrained investigator might think that more evidence would be
  needed before going to trial. In fact, SCAN makes trials unnecessary. Guilt or innocence is so
  much easier to discover by analysing words than by the old fashioned method of having to
  prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

     Sapir claims to know that John Ramsey is ‘an abuser and knows who killed his daughter [Jon
  Benet].’ He analysed the CNN interview of the Ramsey’s done about a week after the murder
  of their daughter. He knows this by Mr. Ramsey’s choice of words. Sapir also claims that
  Magic Johnson got infected with HIV in a bisexual encounter. He knows this because Johnson
  never said he wasn’t a bisexual, only that he wasn’t a homosexual, and he said he was certain
  he got HIV from a woman. According to Sapir, using the word ‘certain’ indicates ‘a lack of
  certainty’.

     I wonder if he’s certain of that?
     It doesn’t do much to instil faith in law enforcement when we see law enforcement officers
  taking classes from people they should be investigating. In their defence, law enforcers claim
  that things like SCAN, the polygraph and the voice stress analyzer ‘work.’ It helps them catch
  the bad guys because some of the bad guys are ignorant and think these things can really
  detect lies with some provable degree of validity. Some of the ignorant are intimidated into
  confessing. They ‘work’ in the same sense that torture or extortion ‘work’. They get the result
  you want some of the time.

  In the name of science
  Apparently, the only thing scientific about Scientific Interrogation and Scientific Content
  Analysis is in the names. The patterns that Mr. Sapir thinks he sees are not supported by
  any scientific studies. His folly has been seen before in cases like Judge Edward Jones and
  personology.

    Given that the Skeptics Dictionary holds itself out as the citadel of unbridled truths it is a
shame that it should misrepresent the facts and overlook the truth that SCAN is effective and
a very good tool for dealing with deception.

    Mr Sapir’s analysis of the story referred to by the Skeptic’s Dictionary may be summarized
as in the table below:1

1 He does his analyses in a simple text, rather than tabular, format
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348