Page 8 - John Belsey
P. 8

Paragraph 2
                                                                          Minimum Expectations or Requirements



                     16   March 2016:                     WH:EDF (Site 13)                          1.6 ha
                          Neighbourhood Plan – Appendix: Sites   No mention of ancient woodland
                          submitted as at February 2014   Size
                                                          WH:EDF (Site 14)                       ?      ?
                     17   2016                            WH:EDF Reference 470
                          SHELAA                          WH:LIC Reference 757
                     18   December  2017                  “Wealden House”(SLAAID 470).   50          1.6ha
                          MSDC Brownfield Register Appendix 3   Dwellings
                          Part 1
                     19   March 2018                      Lists only total number of sites for
                          MSDC District Plan              AW as 102 (Stepped trajectory)
                     20   April 2018:                     Wealden House:                25
                          SHELAA Update                   LIC Reference 757 Overall Total
                                                          (Gross)
                                                          “Wealden House” Reference 470   50


               4. The above table is a work in progress and will be updated as further information becomes
                   available. Four points should be noted:

                   •   The pre-application consultation carries little, if any, weight;
                   •   The SHELAA website states: “These sites do not have planning status. Including them
                       in the SHELAA does not mean that they will be developed in the future;

                   •   The WH:LIC site - of an estimated 0.54 hectares - was never fully evaluated;
                   •   The reports jumble gross and net areas and “capacity” with “requirement.”

               Detailed Appraisal & Confusion
               5. A detailed appraisal made by the Steering Group and approved by MSDC (Attachment 1
                   for the WH:EDF Site 13) states:

                   a) The site’s gross area is 1.2  hectares which includes 0.4  hectares of ancient
                                               16
                                                                           17
                       woodland;
                   b) Two outline proposals had been submitted: one for a mixture of 70  houses and flats
                                                                                        18
                       and another for 68; most of which would be three storeys;
                   c) The site is suitable for development with a “potential housing capacity” of 50+ units
                       but continues:

                       “There is public support for this brownfield development. Two apartment blocks,
                       totalling 14 flats have been built on a former part of the site  and development at a
                                                                                19
                       similar scale would be acceptable, but careful design would be needed to respect the
                       character of the adjoining and neighbouring buildings, including the adjacent Victorian
                       manor house”.

                   6. This statement is critically important in understanding the current impasse over the
                       “approved” density or “minimum requirement” of the WH:EDF site.

                       •  The density of the Ashbourne Park site - for the 14 apartments referred to - is
                          estimated at 28 dwellings per hectare (DdHa);
                       •  If the “scale” were correctly applied to the EDF site – as specified by the Steering
                          Group - the result would be no more than 33 units, including affordable housing
                          and not 71 as submitted in the application;






                                                        Page | 8
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13