Page 273 - All files for Planning Inspectorate
P. 273

Statement of Case
                                              EDF Energy, Wealden House, Lewes Road, Ashurst Wood



               1.3    The application was a revised application following the refusal of an earlier scheme

                      for 71 units on the site.   The revised scheme sought  to  address  and  overcome the

                      reasons for refusal of the earlier scheme.  In addition, whereas the earlier scheme had
                      been policy compliant in respect of the provision of affordable housing, the substantial

                      reduction  in  the  number  of  dwellings  in  the  revised  scheme  and  the  consequential

                      viability analysis meant that, given the significant existing/benchmark land value, the
                      revised scheme could not demonstrate compliance with affordable housing policy and

                      remain viable.


               1.4    The various assessments submitted with the application did not identify any overriding
                      planning policy or other technical objection.  Moreover, the appellant was aware that

                      there was Development Plan policy support for the residential redevelopment of the

                      site,  as  the  site  is  allocated  for  development  of  50+  units  in  the  Ashurst  Wood
                      Neighbourhood  Plan.      Accordingly,  the  residential  redevelopment  of  the  site  is  in

                      compliance with Policy ASW9 of the Neighbourhood Plan (NP) and Policy DP6 of
                      the Mid Sussex District Plan (DP).




               1.5    There was continuing discussion with Council Officers during the processing of the

                      application  relating  mainly  to  affordable  housing  and  parking  matters  which  were
                      issues  that  the  appellant  had  hoped  had  been  resolved  as  a  result  of  further

                      submissions  by  the  appellant’s  Viability  Consultant  and  Transport  Consultant,
                      particularly as, in relation to parking, no objection had been raised by the Highway

                      Authority.


               1.6    However,  the  Council’s  Head  of  Planning  reported  the  application  to  the  District

                                                      th
                      Planning  Committee  on  the  19   September  2019  with  a  recommendation  that  the
                      application be refused.  A copy of the Officer’s Report is attached at APPENDIX 1.


               ___________________________________________________________________________

               10 December, 2019                                                                     Page 3

                                                     Bates No  000272
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278