Page 39 - Servo Motors and Industrial Control Theory
P. 39

2.6   Nyquist Plot                                              31


            Fig. 2.9   Atypical negative
            feedback control system  x   +    e           G(s)               y
                                         –




                                                          H(s)



            the locus when ω goes from 0 to infinity about the real axis. In Fig. 2.18 the locus
            shows when ω travels from zero to infinity.
              In the preceding discussion GH has been the ratio of two polynomials of s. Thus,
            the transport lag   e − Ts  has been excluded. Note, however, that a similar discussion
            applies to systems with transport lag. The proof of this is beyond the scope of this
            book. The stability of a system with transport lag can be determined from the open
            loop frequency response curves by examining the number of encirclement 0 f −1
            point, just as in the case of a system whose open loop transfer function is a ratio of
            two polynomials in s.
              With the previous discussion now the Nyquist stability criterion can be estab-
            lished. For special case where there are no poles or zeros of the GH function on the
            imaginary axis, which is a special case, and if the GH transfer function has k poles
                                                       ( )( )Hs = constant, then the
            on the right half of the imaginary axis and  lim Gs
                                                s→infinity
            closed loop function as s travels from ω = − ∞ to ω = + ∞ is stable if the GH function
            encircle the − 1 point k times. Note that when there are poles of the open loop trans-
            fer function in the right half of the imaginary axis, the open loop transfer function
            is unstable. The above stability criterion states that the closed loop transfer function
            becomes stable.
              Now special cases of the system with various location of poles and zeros will be
            considered. The Nyquist stability criteria as described in the previous section can
            be defined as follows, Let n be number of zeros for the function 1 + G( s)H( s) and k
            the number clockwise encirclement of the − 1 point and let m be number of poles of
            G( s)H( s) in the right half of the s plane. Then the following statement can be made,
            n = k + m. If m is not zero for a stable control system the value of n must be zero,
            then k = −m, which means that there be m counter clockwise encirclement of the − 1
            point. If G( s)H( s) does not have any poles in the right half of s plane then n = k.
            Thus, for stability there must be no encirclement of the − 1 point on the real axis.
            This is the proof of the Nyquist stability used in the next section.



            2.6   Nyquist Plot


            A control system with forward path transfer function G( s) and feedback path trans-
            fer function H( s) is shown in Fig. 2.9.
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44