Page 6 - When Money Costs Too Much: Section 8300 Filing Requirements and Penalties
P. 6

is the same as for failure to file a  rule that a taxpayer must pay the full   Under 31 USC section 5322(a), the
               timely and correct Form 8300 under  assessment before filing a refund suit  criminal penalties are more severe than
               IRC section 6721. Under the BSA,  [Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145,  under the tax code. A person who willful-
               the penalty may be up to the amount  177 (1960)].                  ly violates the Form 8300 filing require-
               involved in the transaction [31 USC   The one avenue for Tax Court  ments can be fined up to $250,000 and
               section 5321(a)(4)].              review exists when a taxpayer did not  up to five years of imprisonment. If
                                                 receive an opportunity for Appeals  the Form 8300 noncompliance occurs
               Challenging Form 8300 and  review and the IRS has issued a notice  while the defendant was violating anoth-
               Related Penalties                 of intent to levy. The taxpayer can  er federal law or as part of an illegal
                 During an examination, the taxpayer  then  challenge  the  penalty  through  activity involving more than $100,000
               should have an opportunity to raise  the Collection Due Process (CDP)  in a 12-month period, the sanctions are
               defenses to penalties. The taxpayer,  procedures [IRC section 6330(c)(2)  increased to a fine of up to $500,000 and
               however, must make a specific request  (B); Our Country Home Enterprises,  up to 10 years of imprisonment.
               for waiver of penalties on the basis of  Inc., v. Comm’r, 855 F.3d 773 (7th   For structuring under the BSA, the
               reasonable cause (IRM 20.1.7.12.1). If  Cir. 2017)]. If the taxpayer does not  criminal penalty is imposed under 31
               the IRS assesses penalties, the taxpayer  prevail during the CDP hearing, the  USC section 5324(d), which provides
               can protest the assessment with the  taxpayer can seek review of that deci-  for a criminal fine and up to five years
               IRS Independent Office of Appeals.  sion in the Tax Court [Callahan v.  of imprisonment. If the structuring
               Form 8300 penalties are “assessable  Comm’r, 130 T.C. 44, 48 (2008)].   occurred while the defendant was vio-
               penalties,” meaning that they are   The IRS provides Appeals rights  lating another federal law or as part
               assessed on notice and demand, and  as a matter of course, and thus it is  of an illegal activity involving more
               they are not subject to the deficiency  rare that a taxpayer can challenge  than $100,000 in a 12-month period,
               procedures, meaning that the taxpayer  Form 8300 penalties in the Tax Court.  the term of imprisonment is increased
               cannot petition for review in the Tax  Rather, the usual course is for the tax-  to up to 10 years.
               Court (IRC section 6671). The IRS  payer to pay a divisible portion of the
               provides for pre-assessment Appeals  penalties and bring a refund action.   Tips to Avoid and Reduce
               review only of penalties for  inten-                               Penalties
               tional disregard of the requirements  Criminal Penalties for Form    The penalties for noncompliance
               (IRM 4.26.11.11.2). For all other Form  8300 Noncompliance         with the Form 8300 rules can have
               8300  and  related  penalties,  there  is   The above discussion focuses on  an extremely detrimental impact on a
               no pre-assessment Appeals review.  civil penalties, but it is important to  business. Below are some suggestions
               Rather, post-assessment, the taxpayer  note that taxpayers who flout these  for CPAs to assist clients with Form
               can request abatement in writing, and  requirements can also be prosecuted  8300 compliance:
               if that request is denied, the taxpayer  if the government is able to prove  ■  Communicate and educate.
               will have an opportunity for Appeals  beyond a reasonable doubt that the  Periodically ask clients whether they
               review (IRM 20.1.1.4.1.2).        taxpayer acted willfully. Criminal  receive cash payments in their trade
                 If the taxpayer does not get relief  charges for failure to file Forms 8300  or business and explain the reporting
               through these procedures (with one  and furnish statement and structuring  requirements.
               exception explained below), the rem-  are brought under IRC section 7203  ■ Develop systems and procedures.
               edy is to pay the penalties and file an  (Willful failure to file return, supply  Assist  clients  in  developing  proce-
               administrative claim for refund, and,  information, or pay tax), which is a  dures to identify large cash transac-
               if that is denied, file a refund action  felony punishable by a fine of up to  tions and promptly report them.
               in federal district court or the Court  $25,000 ($100,000 in the case of a  ■ Promptly correct noncompliance.
               of Claims [IRC section 7422(a), 28  corporation) and up to five years of  If the correction is made within 30
               USC section 1346(a)(1)]. Form 8300  imprisonment. Filing a false Form  days, the initial penalty is reduced.
               penalties are “divisible,” meaning  8300 is prosecuted under IRC section  Even if the correction is made later, it
               that payment of the penalty associ-  7206(1), declarations under penalties  will be a positive factor in the reason-
               ated with a single failure to file is  of perjury, also a felony. The sentence  able cause analysis.                          ■
               sufficient to file a refund claim and  may include a fine of up to $100,000
               institute a refund suit [Chief Counsel  ($500,000 in the case of a corpora-  Megan L. Brackney, JD, LLM (Tax),
               Advice 201315017 (April 12, 2013)].  tion), and three years of imprisonment  is a partner at Kostelanetz & Fink,
               This is an exception to the general  [IRC section 7206(1)].        LLP, New York, N.Y.


                                                                                                               57
                APRIL 2017 / THE CPA JOURNAL                                                                  57
                JUNE 2020 / THE CPA JOURNAL





                                                                                                                 6/28/20   6:01 PM
          06-2020 TPP_zEssentials.temp.indd   57
          06-2020 TPP_zEssentials.temp.indd   57                                                                 6/28/20   6:01 PM
   1   2   3   4   5   6