Page 243 - Gerakan-gerakan Agraria Transnasional
P. 243

La Via Campesina dan Kampanye Global Reforma Agraria

               Referensi


               Akram-Lodhi, H., S. Borras and C. Kay, eds, 2007. Land,
                   Poverty and Livelihoods in an Era of  Globalization.
                   London: Routledge.
               Appadurai, A., 2006. ‘Foreword’. In Transnational Civil
                   Society: An Introduction, eds S. Batliwala and D.L.
                   Brown, xi–xv. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
               Assadi, M., 1994. ‘ “Khadi Curtain,” “Weak Capitalism,”
                   and “Operation Ryot”: Some Ambiguities in Farmers’
                   Discourse, Karnataka and Maharashtra, 1980–93’. In
                   New Farmers’ Movement in India, ed. T. Brass, 212–
                   27. London: Frank Cass.
               Baranyi, S., C.D. Deere and M. Morales, 2004. Scoping
                   Study on Land Policy Research in Latin America. Ot-
                   tawa: The North-South Institute; International Devel-
                   opment Research Centre.
               Batliwala, S.,  2002.  ‘Grassroots  Movements  as
                   Transnational Actors: Implications for Global Civil So-
                   ciety’.  Voluntas: International Journal of  Voluntary
                   and Nonprofit Organizations,13 (4): 393–409.
               Batliwala, S. and D.L. Brown, eds, 2006. Transnational
                   Civil Society:  An Introduction.Bloomfield, CT:
                   Kumarian Press.
               Bello, W.,  2002.  Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World
                   Economy. London: Zed.
               Bernstein, H., 2002. ‘Land Reform: Taking a Long(er)
                   View’. Journal of  Agrarian Change, 2 (4): 433–63.
               Bernstein, H., 2006. ‘Once Were/Still Are Peasants? Farm-
                   ing in a Globalising “South” ’. New Political Economy,
                   11 (3): 399–406.
               Berry, S., 2002. ‘Debating the Land Question in Africa’.
                   Comparative Study in Society and History, 44 (4): 638–
                   68.



                                                                  229
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248