Page 252 - Gerakan-gerakan Agraria Transnasional
P. 252

GERAKAN AGRARIA TRANSNASIONAL

            Smith, J. and H. Johnston, 2002. Globalization and Resis-
                tance:  Transnational Dimensions of  Social Move-
                ments. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Pub-
                lishers.
            Spoor, M., ed., forthcoming. Contested Land in the ‘East’:
                Land and Rural Markets in Transition Economies.
                London: Routledge.
            Stedile, J.P., 2002. ‘Landless Battalions: The Sem Terra
                Movement of Brazil’. New Left Review, 15: 77–105.
            Stedile, J.P., 2007. ‘The Class Struggles in Brazil: The Per-
                spective of the MST’. In ‘Global Flashpoints: Reac-
                tions to Imperialism and Neoliberalism’, Socialist Reg-
                ister 2008, eds L. Panitch and C. Leys. London: Mer-
                lin Press.
            Tadem, E., 1996. ‘Reflections on NGO-PO Relations’.
                Paper presented at the NGO Parallel Forum to the Vía
                Campesina International Assembly, April 1996,
                Tlaxcala, Mexico. Vía Campesina Tlaxcala unpub-
                lished documents.
            Tarrow, S., 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements,
                Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge
                University Press.
            Tarrow, S., 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cam-
                bridge: Cambridge University Press.
            Tilly, C., 2004.  Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder,
                CO: Paradigm Publishers.
            Van Donge, J.K., with G. Eiseb and A. Mosimane, 2007.
                ‘Land Reform in Namibia: Issues of Equity and Pov-
                erty’. In  Land, Poverty and Livelihoods in an Era of
                Globalization, eds H. Akram Lodhi, S. Borras and C.
                Kay, 284–309. London: Routledge.
            Veltmeyer, H., 1997. ‘New Social Movements in Latin
                America: The Dynamics of Class and Identity’. Jour-
                nal of  Peasant Studies, 25 (1): 139–69.



            238
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257