Page 9 - HOW TO TEACH GRAMMAR
P. 9

WHY TEACH GRAMMAR?

                  In 1622 a  certain  Joseph Webbe,  schoolmaster and textbook  writer wrote:  “No  grammar can  run
                  speedily  to  the  mark of  language  that  is shackled …with  grammar precepts.”  He  maintained  that
                  grammar could be picked up through simply communicating: “By exercise or reading, writing, and
                  speaking… all  things  belonging  to  Grammar,  will  without  labor,  and  whether we  will  or  no,  thrust
                  themselves upon us.”

                  Differences  in  attitude  to  the  role  of  grammar  underpin  differences  between  methods,  between
                  teachers, and between learners. Here, for example, are a number of resent statements on the subject:
                  “There is no doubt that a knowledge – implicit or explicit – of grammatical rules is essential for the
                  mastery of a language.” (Penny Ur, a teacher trainer, and an author of “Grammar Practice Activities)

                  “The effects of grammar teaching … appear to be Peripherical and fragile.” (Stephen Krashen, an
                  influential, if controversial, applied linguist)
                  “A  sound  knowledge  of  grammar  is  essential  if  pupils  are  going  to  use  English  creatively”  (Tom
                  Hutchinson, a course-book writer)

                  “Grammar is not very important: The majority of languages have very complex grammar. English has
                  little grammar and consequently it is not very important to understand it.” (From the publicity of a London
                  language school)


                  What Is Your Most Compelling Reason for Teaching Grammar?


                  Amy Benjamin
                  Hendrick Hudson High School

                  Montrose, New York
                  President, NCTE Assembly on the Teaching of English

                  Grammar

                  mrsbenj@aol.com
                  I teach grammar for two reasons. The first is that grammar instruction gives students metalanguage,
                  “language  about  language.”  Having  this,  students  can  learn  a  great  deal  more  about  how  to
                  communicate clearly than they can without it. The second reason is that students are interested in
                  language— its changes and variations—and they feel gratified to learn how it works and what it can
                  do. Whether I am teaching Shakespeare or contemporary literature, oratory or poetry, writing as a
                  means to learn or writing through process, the effort that I’ve put into teaching grammar pays off. But
                  aside from its utilitarian purpose, grammar instruction is fun. Everyone seems interested in language
                  on some level. As John Crow of Florida Southern College points out, properly structured grammar
                  instruction is highly brain-compatible because the brain is a pattern-seeing device and grammar is a
                  patterned system (email message to the author 5 Jan. 2006). If we go with the natural ability of the
                  human  brain  to  make  meaning  through  patterns,  we  can  easily  teach  grammar  and  have  it  be
                  something that delights students because of how much of the system they come to us already knowing.



                                                              9
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14