Page 741 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 741

c17ExternalitiesandPublicGoods.qxd  8/22/10  4:56 AM  Page 715







                                                                           17.2 EXTERNALITIES                   715

                      APPLICA TION  17.5
                      Knowledge Spillovers
                                                                       located in the same geographic area. Silicon Valley
                      and Innovation                                   is a prime example of MAR spillovers, with thou-
                                                                       sands of high-technology companies located in a
                      Economists have long recognized that an important  small area. When there is a concentration of firms
                      positive externality is knowledge spillovers. Exchange  using related technologies, employees from differ-
                      of new ideas, and learning from the creativity of   ent firms are more likely to interact with each other
                      others, often inspire innovations by others. For exam-  professionally or socially, or switch employers. These
                      ple, one pharmaceutical firm may develop a new   interactions increase the likelihood that new ideas
                      blockbuster drug using a specific type of organic   will proliferate across firms, generating additional
                      molecule. Other firms may be inspired by this devel-  innovations.
                      opment to focus research and development on similar  The second form of knowledge spillovers is Jacobs
                      molecules, which may lead to additional new drugs.  Spillovers, named after Jane Jacobs. She argued that
                      Because of such knowledge spillovers, governments  knowledge spillovers may be created by having a con-
                      often subsidize investments in research and develop-  centration of firms from diverse industries (in contrast
                      ment, especially through universities.           to MAR spillovers), because innovations in one indus-
                         Like most externalities, knowledge spillovers  try may be applicable in other industries too. Indeed,
                      arise because of imperfect property rights. If a firm  Jacobs spillovers are based on the idea that much cre-
                      could obtain legal protection for all of the economic  ativity comes from interdisciplinary interactions. This
                      applications of a new idea (via patent, copyright, or  same idea is why universities are now building inter-
                      trademark protection), it would certainly do so. The  disciplinary research labs, hoping for new innovations
                      firm would then be able to profit from all of these   across departments (e.g., application of information
                      applications, possibly by selling or renting the rights  technology to medicine).
                      to some of those applications to others. In principal  A recent study by Gerard Carlino summarizes
                      this would lead to greater innovation. However, as   prior empirical research on these questions and pro-
                                                                                              8
                      we have discussed earlier in the text, there is a trade-  vides some new evidence. Evidence suggests that
                      off, since such protections would also create monop-  spillovers from concentration of firms in the same
                      oly profits for the firm. In addition, it is not obvious  area are indeed important to innovation. For exam-
                      that a single firm would be able to profitably exploit  ple, in the 1990s 92 percent of all patents went to
                      all of the possible applications of its new ideas.  residents of metropolitan areas, even though metro-
                      Creativity often arises from combining ideas and in-  politan areas comprise only 75 percent of the U.S.
                      formation from different people or firms, applying  population. For example, San Jose, California had
                      one idea in an unexpected new setting. For these   17.6 patents per 10,000 citizens, compared to 2.5
                      reasons, economists generally argue that knowledge  nationally. Table 17.1 shows the top and bottom 10
                      spillovers have strong positive effects on innovation  U.S. cities, ranked by number of patents per 10,000
                      and economic growth.                             citizens in the 1990s. Economists have also studied
                         Economists who study innovation describe two  which existing patents are cited by a new patent
                      relevant sources of knowledge spillovers. The first is  application. Cited patents are 5–10 times more likely
                      MAR Spillovers, named after the economists who first  to originate in the same metropolitan area as the
                      analyzed them, Alfred Marshall (in 1890), Kenneth  new patent, providing strong evidence that personal
                      Arrow, and Paul Romer. MAR spillovers occur when  interactions between employees across firms create
                      there is a concentration of firms in the same industry  knowledge spillovers.






                      8 Gerald Carlino, “Knowledge Spillovers: Cities’ Role in the New Economy,” Business Review, Federal
                      Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Quarter 4, 2001.
   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746